Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Aneuploid embryo transfer: clinical policies and provider opinions at United States fertility clinics.
McGowan, Rebecca; Pilipenko, Valentina; Smolarek, Teresa A; West, Elizabeth; Tolusso, Leandra K.
Afiliação
  • McGowan R; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • Pilipenko V; Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • Smolarek TA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • West E; Institute for Reproductive Health, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • Tolusso LK; Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. Electronic address: Leandra.tolusso@cchmc.org.
Fertil Steril ; 114(1): 110-117, 2020 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32622405
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To describe institutional clinical policies and individual provider opinions regarding aneuploid embryo transfer (aET).

DESIGN:

A survey about clinical policies was electronically sent to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) member laboratory directors, and a separate survey about personal opinions was electronically sent to all SART members.

SETTING:

Not applicable. PATIENTS Patients pursuing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). INTERVENTION Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Current clinical policies about aET were described. Individual provider opinions about aET in the context of specific aneuploidies and mosaicism were also described.

RESULTS:

A total of 48 laboratory directors and 212 individual providers responded to their respective surveys. Twelve (25%) clinics report that they do not have a policy regarding aET, but clinics performing PGT-A in >100 cycles per year were more likely to have a policy. Half of the individual providers agree that an embryo with trisomy 21 should be available for aET, but most disagreed with aET of embryos with other aneuploidies and most were either unsure about or unwilling to transfer embryos with mosaicism. Those who worked in primarily patient-facing roles held more agreeable opinions regarding aET.

CONCLUSION:

There is no consensus regarding ideal clinical policies for aET. The wide range of current clinical practices and individual provider opinions regarding under what circumstances, if any, aET should be available to patients indicates that this is a divisive issue among ART providers, and there is a clear need for specific professional guidelines to address this issue.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Padrões de Prática Médica / Transferência Embrionária / Clínicas de Fertilização / Política de Saúde / Aneuploidia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Newborn / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Padrões de Prática Médica / Transferência Embrionária / Clínicas de Fertilização / Política de Saúde / Aneuploidia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Newborn / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article