Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pre-implantological treatment routines for alveolar ridge atrophy - an investigation among maxillofacial and oral surgeons in southern Germany.
Korsch, Michael; Walther, Winfried; Robra, Bernt-Peter; Sahin, Aynur; Hannig, Matthias; Bartols, Andreas.
Afiliação
  • Korsch M; Dental Academy for Continuing Professional Development, Karlsruhe, Lorenzstrasse 7, 76135, Karlsruhe, Germany.
  • Walther W; Clinic of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, University Hospital, Saarland University, Building 73, 66421, Homburg, Germany.
  • Robra BP; Center for Implantology and Oral Surgery, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Sahin A; Dental Academy for Continuing Professional Development, Karlsruhe, Lorenzstrasse 7, 76135, Karlsruhe, Germany.
  • Hannig M; Institute of Social Medicine and Health Services Research, Otto-von-Guericke-University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
  • Bartols A; Private Practice, Blumenstrasse 5, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
BMC Oral Health ; 20(1): 195, 2020 07 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32641041
BACKGROUND: It is not well-known which pre-implantological procedures are preferred by maxillofacial (MFS) and oral surgeons (OS) for the narrow atrophic alveolar ridge under practice based conditions and, if different training paths in surgery lead to other pre-implantological techniques being preferred. This study aims to identify which procedures are preferred by the respective specialists in which indication. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to a total of 300 MFS and OS in southern Germany. The questionnaire examined pre-implantological procedures (bone block, bone grafting material and/or particulate autogenous bone, titanium mesh, bone split, resection) in the edentulous severely atrophic mandible and in the severely atrophic single-tooth gap. Kendall's Tau-b test was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: One hundred seventeen participants returned the questionnaire. 68 (58%) were OS and 49 (42%) were MFS. In the edentulous mandible, bone substitute material and resection were most preferred by both specialists. Bone blocks were statistically significantly more frequently associated with MFS and bone substitute materials with OS. Bone split was more frequently used in the atrophic single tooth gap than in the edentulous mandible. OS preferred bone blocks in the single tooth gap more often than in the edentulous mandible. MFS and OS preferred resection in the edentulous mandible significantly more frequently than in the single tooth gap. CONCLUSIONS: MFS in general prefer more invasive pre-implantological therapies with the same initial diagnosis than OS, which seems to be attributed to different training paths.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Padrões de Prática Médica / Implantes Dentários / Aumento do Rebordo Alveolar / Cirurgiões Bucomaxilofaciais Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Padrões de Prática Médica / Implantes Dentários / Aumento do Rebordo Alveolar / Cirurgiões Bucomaxilofaciais Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article