Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assignment of pre-event ASA physical status classification by pre-hospital physicians: a prospective inter-rater reliability study.
Tønsager, Kristin; Rehn, Marius; Krüger, Andreas J; Røislien, Jo; Ringdal, Kjetil G.
Afiliação
  • Tønsager K; Department of Research, The Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Oslo, Norway. kristin.tonsager@norskluftambulanse.no.
  • Rehn M; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway. kristin.tonsager@norskluftambulanse.no.
  • Krüger AJ; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway. kristin.tonsager@norskluftambulanse.no.
  • Røislien J; Department of Research, The Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Oslo, Norway.
  • Ringdal KG; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 20(1): 167, 2020 07 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32646386
BACKGROUND: Individualized treatment is a common principle in hospitals. Treatment decisions are made based on the patient's condition, including comorbidities. This principle is equally relevant out-of-hospital. Furthermore, comorbidity is an important risk-adjustment factor when evaluating pre-hospital interventions and may aid therapeutic decisions and triage. The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) classification system is included in templates for reporting data in physician-staffed pre-hospital emergency medical services (p-EMS) but whether an adequate full pre-event ASA-PS can be assessed by pre-hospital physicians remains unknown. We aimed to explore whether pre-hospital physicians can score an adequate pre-event ASA-PS with the information available on-scene. METHODS: The study was an inter-rater reliability study consisting of two steps. Pre-event ASA-PS scores made by pre- and in-hospital physicians were compared. Pre-hospital physicians did not have access to patient records and scores were based on information obtainable on-scene. In-hospital physicians used the complete patient record (Step 1). To assess inter-rater reliability between pre- and in-hospital physicians when given equal amounts of information, pre-hospital physicians also assigned pre-event ASA-PS for 20 of the included patients by using the complete patient records (Step 2). Inter-rater reliability was analyzed using quadratic weighted Cohen's kappa (κw). RESULTS: For most scores (82%) inter-rater reliability between pre-and in-hospital physicians were moderate to substantial (κw 0,47-0,89). Inter-rater reliability was higher among the in-hospital physicians (κw 0,77 to 0.85). When all physicians had access to the same information, κw increased (κw 0,65 to 0,93). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-hospital physicians can score an adequate pre-event ASA-PS on-scene for most patients. To further increase inter-rater reliability, we recommend access to the full patient journal on-scene. We recommend application of the full ASA-PS classification system for reporting of comorbidity in p-EMS.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Serviços Médicos de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Serviços Médicos de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article