Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The ideal auricular protrusion - An interactive perceptual pilot study.
Pausch, Niels Christian; Pankow, Tabea; Lethaus, Bernd; Bartella, Alexander Karl-Heinz; Halama, Dirk.
Afiliação
  • Pausch NC; Department of Oral, Craniomaxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery (Head: Prof. Dr. Dr. Bernd Lethaus), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: niels.pausch@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
  • Pankow T; Department of Oral, Craniomaxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery (Head: Prof. Dr. Dr. Bernd Lethaus), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Leipzig, Germany.
  • Lethaus B; Department of Oral, Craniomaxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery (Head: Prof. Dr. Dr. Bernd Lethaus), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Leipzig, Germany.
  • Bartella AK; Department of Oral, Craniomaxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery (Head: Prof. Dr. Dr. Bernd Lethaus), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Leipzig, Germany.
  • Halama D; Department of Oral, Craniomaxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery (Head: Prof. Dr. Dr. Bernd Lethaus), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Leipzig, Germany.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 48(9): 853-858, 2020 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32709502
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Excessive ear protrusion (prominauris) can negatively affect facial appearance. Because the concept of an ideal auriculocephalic angle is controversial, however, it is difficult to define when an obtrusive auricle requires surgical intervention. It is often assumed that angles exceeding 30° require corrective surgery. However, little is known about public perception of ear protrusion. This study aimed to assess perceptions of different degrees of auricular protrusion. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We conducted an interactive panel survey. Male and female evaluators assessed digitally processed cloned images of a male and female model that depicted various ear protrusions ranging from 0° to 90°. Predictor variables were the sex of the evaluator, the sex of the clone and the extent of auricular protrusion. The outcome variable was the overall attractiveness of auricular appearance.

RESULTS:

Forty-four evaluators (students of dental medicine, mean age 25.43 years) participated in the study 22 women and 22 men. The study results revealed sexual dimorphism, with the attractiveness of corresponding male and female clones rated differently. Male evaluators favoured female ear positions that fitted closer to the head; preferred alignments for female clones were 18° (Mean) ± 9.38° (SD), p = 0.006; for male clones 30° ± 7.94°, p = 0.003. Ear protrusion starts to negatively affect aesthetic appearance for male evaluators at positions of 42° ± 4.87° (female clone) and 54° ± 8.22° (male clone), p = 0.001. The panel of evaluators agreed to perceive angles of 21-24° ± 8.10° (female clones), ± 8.33° (male clones), as the ideal degree of protrusion in both sexes (p = 0.158).

CONCLUSION:

In this study, perception of ear appearance depended on the sex of both the evaluator and the clone being assessed. Obtrusive ears were more readily accepted in male faces than in female ones. Nevertheless, the overall panel perception shows a preference for rather close fitting, unobtrusive ear alignments. For planning of corrective ear surgery, a target angle of approximately 22° can be considered as a desirable result.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pavilhão Auricular Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pavilhão Auricular Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article