Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Collagen Matrix With Mucoperiosteum Graft as an Effective Fatless Flapless Reconstruction After Endoscopic Pituitary Adenoma Resection.
Shahein, Mostafa; Montaser, Alaa S; Barbero, Juan M Revuelta; Maza, Guillermo; Todeschini, Alexandre B; Otto, Bradley A; Carrau, Ricardo L; Prevedello, Daniel M.
Afiliação
  • Shahein M; Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Montaser AS; Department of Neurological Surgery, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt.
  • Barbero JMR; Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Maza G; Department of Neurological Surgery, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
  • Todeschini AB; Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Otto BA; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Carrau RL; Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Prevedello DM; Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) ; 19(6): E573-E580, 2020 11 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32710760
BACKGROUND: Proper skull base reconstruction after endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery is of great importance to decrease the rate of complications. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of reconstruction with materials other than fat graft and naso-septal flaps (NSF) to avoid their associated morbidities. METHODS: The authors' institutional database for patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary adenoma was reviewed. Exclusion criteria included recurrence, postradiation therapy, and reconstruction by fat graft or NSF. They were divided into group A, where collagen matrix (CM) (DuraGen® Plus Matrix, Integra LifeSciences Corporation, Plainsboro, New Jersey) alone was used; group B, where CM and simple mucoperiosteum graft were used and group C, which included cases without CM utilization. RESULTS: The study included 252 patients. No age, gender, or body mass index statistically significant difference between groups. Group B included the largest tumor size (23.0 mm) in comparison to groups A (18.0 mm) and C (13.0 mm). Suprasellar extension was more frequently present (49.4%) in comparison to groups A (29.8%, P = .001) and C (21.2%, P < .001). Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak rate was 0%, 2.9%, and 6% in groups A, B, and C, respectively. In group B, the CSF leak rate decreased from 45.9% intraoperatively to 2.9% postoperatively (P < .001). In group A, the CSF leak reduction rate was almost statistically significant (P = .06). CONCLUSION: Utilization of CM and simple mucosperiosteal graft in skull base reconstruction following pituitary adenoma surgery is an effective method to avoid the morbidities associated with NSF or fat graft.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Hipofisárias / Adenoma Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Hipofisárias / Adenoma Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article