Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can we predict real-time fMRI neurofeedback learning success from pretraining brain activity?
Haugg, Amelie; Sladky, Ronald; Skouras, Stavros; McDonald, Amalia; Craddock, Cameron; Kirschner, Matthias; Herdener, Marcus; Koush, Yury; Papoutsi, Marina; Keynan, Jackob N; Hendler, Talma; Cohen Kadosh, Kathrin; Zich, Catharina; MacInnes, Jeff; Adcock, R Alison; Dickerson, Kathryn; Chen, Nan-Kuei; Young, Kymberly; Bodurka, Jerzy; Yao, Shuxia; Becker, Benjamin; Auer, Tibor; Schweizer, Renate; Pamplona, Gustavo; Emmert, Kirsten; Haller, Sven; Van De Ville, Dimitri; Blefari, Maria-Laura; Kim, Dong-Youl; Lee, Jong-Hwan; Marins, Theo; Fukuda, Megumi; Sorger, Bettina; Kamp, Tabea; Liew, Sook-Lei; Veit, Ralf; Spetter, Maartje; Weiskopf, Nikolaus; Scharnowski, Frank.
Afiliação
  • Haugg A; Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
  • Sladky R; Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Skouras S; Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • McDonald A; Department of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
  • Craddock C; Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Kirschner M; Department of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas.
  • Herdener M; Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
  • Koush Y; McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
  • Papoutsi M; Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
  • Keynan JN; Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Hendler T; UCL Huntington's Disease Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, England.
  • Cohen Kadosh K; Functional Brain Center, Wohl Institute for Advanced Imaging, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Zich C; Functional Brain Center, Wohl Institute for Advanced Imaging, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • MacInnes J; School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, England.
  • Adcock RA; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England.
  • Dickerson K; Institute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Chen NK; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Young K; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Bodurka J; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
  • Yao S; Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  • Becker B; Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
  • Auer T; Clinical Hospital of Chengdu the Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Laboratory for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
  • Schweizer R; Clinical Hospital of Chengdu the Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Laboratory for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
  • Pamplona G; School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, England.
  • Emmert K; Functional Imaging Laboratory, German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany.
  • Haller S; Hôpital and Ophtalmique Jules Gonin, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Van De Ville D; Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
  • Blefari ML; Radiology-Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Kim DY; Center for Neuroprosthetics, Ecole Polytechnique Féderale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Lee JH; Department of Radiology and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Marins T; Center for Neuroprosthetics, Ecole Polytechnique Féderale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Fukuda M; Department of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Sorger B; Department of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kamp T; D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Liew SL; School of Fundamental Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Veit R; Department Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Spetter M; Department Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Weiskopf N; Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
  • Scharnowski F; Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center Munich, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Hum Brain Mapp ; 41(14): 3839-3854, 2020 10 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32729652
Neurofeedback training has been shown to influence behavior in healthy participants as well as to alleviate clinical symptoms in neurological, psychosomatic, and psychiatric patient populations. However, many real-time fMRI neurofeedback studies report large inter-individual differences in learning success. The factors that cause this vast variability between participants remain unknown and their identification could enhance treatment success. Thus, here we employed a meta-analytic approach including data from 24 different neurofeedback studies with a total of 401 participants, including 140 patients, to determine whether levels of activity in target brain regions during pretraining functional localizer or no-feedback runs (i.e., self-regulation in the absence of neurofeedback) could predict neurofeedback learning success. We observed a slightly positive correlation between pretraining activity levels during a functional localizer run and neurofeedback learning success, but we were not able to identify common brain-based success predictors across our diverse cohort of studies. Therefore, advances need to be made in finding robust models and measures of general neurofeedback learning, and in increasing the current study database to allow for investigating further factors that might influence neurofeedback learning.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prática Psicológica / Encéfalo / Mapeamento Encefálico / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Neurorretroalimentação Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prática Psicológica / Encéfalo / Mapeamento Encefálico / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Neurorretroalimentação Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article