Reliability and Validity of 2 Surgical Prioritization Systems for Reinstating Nonemergent Benign Gynecologic Surgery during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol
; 28(4): 838-849, 2021 04.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-32739612
ABSTRACT
STUDY OBJECTIVE:
Scientifically evaluate the validity and reproducibility of 2 novel surgical triaging systems, as well as offer modifications to the Medically-Necessary, Time-Sensitive (MeNTS) criteria for improved application in gynecologic surgeries.DESIGN:
Retrospective cohort study.SETTING:
Academic university hospital. PATIENTS Ninety-seven patients with delayed benign gynecologic procedures owing to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. INTERVENTION(S) Surgical prioritization was assessed using 2 novel scoring systems, the Gynecologic Medically-Necessary Time-Sensitive (Gyn-MeNTS) and modified Elective Surgery Acuity Scale (mESAS) systems for all 93 patients included. MEASUREMENTS AND MAINRESULTS:
The interrater reliability and validity of 2 novel surgical prioritization systems (Gyn-MeNTS and mESAS) were assessed. The Gyn-MeNTS scores were calculated by 3 raters and analyzed as continuous variables, with a lower score indicating more urgency/priority. The mESAS score was calculated by 2 raters and analyzed as a 3-level ordinal variable with a higher score indicating more urgency/priority. All 5 raters were blinded to reduce bias. The Gyn-MeNTS interrater reliability was tested using Spearman r and paired t tests were used to detect systematic differences between raters. Weighted κ indicated mESAS reliability. Concurrent validity with mESAS and surgeon self-prioritization (SSP) was examined with Spearman r and logistic regression. Spearman r's for all Gyn-MeNTS rater pairs were above 0.80 (0.84 for 1 vs 2; 0.82 for 1 vs 3; and 0.82 for 2 vs 3, all p <.001) indicating strong agreement. The weighted κ for the 2 mESAS raters was 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.73) indicating moderate agreement. When used together, both scores were significantly independently associated with SSP, with strong discrimination (area under the curve, 0.89).CONCLUSION:
Interrater reliability is acceptable for both scoring systems, and concurrent validity of each is moderate for predicting SSP, but discrimination improves to a high level when they are used together.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia
/
Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão
/
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos
/
Atenção à Saúde
/
Gravidade do Paciente
/
SARS-CoV-2
/
COVID-19
Tipo de estudo:
Etiology_studies
/
Incidence_studies
/
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Limite:
Adult
/
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2021
Tipo de documento:
Article