Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Minimally important differences for interpreting the EORTC QLQ-C30 in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy.
Musoro, J Z; Sodergren, S C; Coens, C; Pochesci, A; Terada, M; King, M T; Sprangers, M A G; Groenvold, M; Cocks, K; Velikova, G; Flechtner, H-H; Bottomley, A.
Afiliação
  • Musoro JZ; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium.
  • Sodergren SC; School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Coens C; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium.
  • Pochesci A; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium.
  • Terada M; Japan Clinical Oncology Group, Clinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • King MT; Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Sprangers MAG; Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Groenvold M; Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen and Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Cocks K; Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, UK.
  • Velikova G; Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Flechtner HH; Clinic for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
  • Bottomley A; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium.
Colorectal Dis ; 22(12): 2278-2287, 2020 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32767619
ABSTRACT

AIM:

The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) assesses the health-related quality of life of patients in cancer trials. There are currently no minimally important difference (MID) guidelines for the EORTC QLQ-C30 for colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aims to estimate MIDs for the EORTC QLQ-C30 scales in patients with advanced CRC treated with chemotherapy and enrolled in clinical trials.

METHOD:

The data were obtained from three published EORTC trials that treated CRC patients using chemotherapy. Potential anchors were selected from clinical variables based on their correlation with EORTC QLQ-C30 scales. Anchor-based MIDs for within-group change and between-group change were estimated via the mean change method and linear regression, respectively, and summarized using weighted correlation. Distribution-based MIDs were also examined.

RESULTS:

Anchor-based MIDs were determined for deterioration in 8 of the 14 EORTC QLQ-C30 scales and in 9 scales for improvement, and varied by scale, direction of change and anchor. MIDs for improvement (deterioration) ranged from 6 to 18 (-11 to -5) points for within-group change and 5 to 15 (-10 to -4) for between-group change. Summarized MIDs (in absolute values) per scale mostly ranged from 5 to 10 points.

CONCLUSIONS:

These findings have clinical relevance for the interpretation of treatment efficacy and the design of clinical trials by informing sample size requirements.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Neoplasias Colorretais Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Neoplasias Colorretais Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article