Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Role of Cadaver-Based Flap Course in Microsurgical Education and Practice Patterns of Attendees: A Survey Study.
Azoury, Saïd C; Othman, Sammy; Colen, David L; Broach, Robyn B; Lin, Ines; Zenn, Michael R; Kovach, Stephen J; Levin, L Scott.
Afiliação
  • Azoury SC; Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Othman S; Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Colen DL; Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Broach RB; Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Lin I; Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Zenn MR; Zenn Plastic Surgery, Raleigh, North Carolina.
  • Kovach SJ; Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Levin LS; Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Reconstr Microsurg ; 37(2): 154-160, 2021 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32871600
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In 2017, our institution initiated a cadaver laboratory-based course dedicated to teaching reconstructive microsurgery indications, preoperative planning, and flap dissection. The goals of this study are to describe the demographics and experience of participants/instructors and to evaluate the learning objectives and effectiveness of the course.

METHODS:

Penn Flap Course (PFC) participants were sent an anonymous survey at the inaugural PFC 2017. Then, in 2019, both instructors and participants were sent a more comprehensive survey. Surveys included questions regarding demographics, training background, experiences in practice and/or training, and course evaluation.

RESULTS:

At PFC 2017, participant response rate was 25% (12/44), and the primary reason for attending the course was to observe and learn from instructor dissections (66.7%). At PFC 2019, the response rate was 77.3% (17/22) for faculty and 73.0% (35/48) for participants. Both in 2017 and 2019, the vast majority of participants reported perceived improvement in understanding of flap dissection principles across all anatomic domains (94.3%-100%). In 2019, when asked about their background experience, the majority of participants reported comfort performing arterial and venous anastomosis without supervision (71%-77%) and being least comfortable with head and neck (H&N) microsurgery (mean comfort level 5.2/10). Half of the participants (e.g., residents) find the presence of a microsurgery fellow at their institution useful to their educational experience. Instructors with additional fellowship training in microsurgery reported performing a higher volume of free flaps per week (7 vs. 2.3) and per year (94.2 vs. 27.8; p < 0.05 for both) and trend toward performing more H&N reconstruction (p = 0.057).

CONCLUSION:

Participants feel least comfortable with H&N microsurgical reconstruction. Surgical faculty with microsurgical fellowship training performs greater volume of microsurgical cases with a trend toward more H&N reconstruction. A cadaver/lecture-based flap course is an effective way to improve participants' perceived confidence and understanding of complex flap and microsurgical reconstructive procedures.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article