Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with metastatic cancer not receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in US clinical practice.
Averin, Ahuva; Silvia, Amanda; Lamerato, Lois; Richert-Boe, Kathryn; Kaur, Manpreet; Sundaresan, Devi; Shah, Neel; Hatfield, Mark; Lawrence, Tatiana; Lyman, Gary H; Weycker, Derek.
Afiliação
  • Averin A; Policy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Four Davis Court, Brookline, MA, 02445, USA.
  • Silvia A; Policy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Four Davis Court, Brookline, MA, 02445, USA.
  • Lamerato L; Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
  • Richert-Boe K; Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Kaur M; Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
  • Sundaresan D; Reliant Medical Group, Worcester, MA, USA.
  • Shah N; Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
  • Hatfield M; Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
  • Lawrence T; Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
  • Lyman GH; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Weycker D; Policy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Four Davis Court, Brookline, MA, 02445, USA. dweycker@pai2.com.
Support Care Cancer ; 29(4): 2179-2186, 2021 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32880732
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis in US patients with selected metastatic cancers and chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence and associated outcomes among the subgroup who did not receive prophylaxis. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at four US health systems and included adults with metastatic cancer (breast, colorectal, lung, non-Hodgkin lymphoma [NHL]) who received myelosuppressive chemotherapy (2009-2017). Patients were stratified by FN risk level based on risk factors and chemotherapy (low/unclassified risk, intermediate risk without any risk factors, intermediate risk with ≥ 1 risk factor [IR + 1], high risk [HR]). G-CSF use was evaluated among all patients stratified by FN risk, and FN/FN-related outcomes were evaluated among patients who did not receive first-cycle G-CSF prophylaxis. RESULTS: Among 1457 metastatic cancer patients, 20.5% and 28.1% were classified as HR and IR + 1, respectively. First-cycle G-CSF prophylaxis use was 48.5% among HR patients and 13.9% among IR + 1 patients. In the subgroup not receiving first-cycle G-CSF prophylaxis, FN incidence in cycle 1 was 7.8% for HR patients and 4.8% for IR + 1 patients; during the course, corresponding values were 16.9% and 15.9%. Most (> 90%) FN episodes required hospitalization, and mortality risk ranged from 7.1 to 26.9% across subgroups. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, the majority of metastatic cancer chemotherapy patients for whom G-CSF prophylaxis is recommended did not receive it; FN incidence in this subgroup was notably high. Patients with elevated FN risk should be carefully identified and managed to ensure appropriate use of supportive care.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Segunda Neoplasia Primária / Neutropenia Febril Induzida por Quimioterapia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Segunda Neoplasia Primária / Neutropenia Febril Induzida por Quimioterapia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article