Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association of Use of the NEJM Knowledge+ Product and Performance on the ABIM IM-MOC Exam.
Healy, Michael G; Gray, Bradley M; Duhigg, Lauren M; O'Rourke, Matthew; Marchwinski, Leokadia; Elmore, Melissa; Phitayakorn, Roy.
Afiliação
  • Healy MG; Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Gray BM; NEJM Group, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Duhigg LM; American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • O'Rourke M; American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Marchwinski L; NEJM Group, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Elmore M; NEJM Group, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Phitayakorn R; NEJM Group, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Teach Learn Med ; 33(1): 21-27, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32928000
ABSTRACT
Phenomenon Internal medicine physicians in the United States must pass the American Board of Internal Medicine Internal Medicine Maintenance of Certification (ABIM IM-MOC) examination as part of their ABIM IM-MOC requirements. Many of these physicians use an examination product to help them prepare, such as e-Learning products, including the ACP's MKSAP, UpToDate, and NEJM Knowledge+, yet their effectiveness remains largely unstudied.

Approach:

We compared ABIM IM-MOC examination performance among 177 physicians who attempted an ABIM IM-MOC examination between 2014-2017 and completed at least 75% of the NEJM Knowledge+ product prior to the ABIM IM-MOC examination and 177 very similar matched control physicians who did not use NEJM Knowledge+. Our measures of ABIM IM-MOC exam performance for NEJM Knowledge+ users were based on the results of the first attempt immediately following the NEJM Knowledge+ use and for non-users were based on the applicable matched examination performance. The three dichotomous examination performance outcomes measured on the first attempt at the ABIM IM-MOC examination included pass rate, scoring in the upper quartile, and scoring in the lower quartile.

Findings:

Use of NEJM Knowledge+ was associated with a regression adjusted 10.6% (5.37% to 15.8%) greater likelihood of passing the MOC examination (p < .001), 10.7% (2.61% to 18.7%) greater likelihood of having an examination score in the top quartile (p = .009), and -10.8% (-16.8% to -4.86%) lower likelihood of being in the bottom quartile of the MOC examination (p < .001) as compared to similar physicians who did not use NEJM Knowledge+. Insight Physicians who used NEJM Knowledge+ had better ABIM IM-MOC exam performance. Further research is needed to determine what aspects of e-Learning products best prepare physicians for MOC examinations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Conselhos de Especialidade Profissional / Certificação / Competência Clínica / Avaliação Educacional / Medicina Interna / Licenciamento em Medicina Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Conselhos de Especialidade Profissional / Certificação / Competência Clínica / Avaliação Educacional / Medicina Interna / Licenciamento em Medicina Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article