Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is Preoperative Staphylococcus aureus Screening and Decolonization Effective at Reducing Surgical Site Infection in Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With a Special Focus on Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty.
Ribau, Ana I; Collins, Jamie E; Chen, Antonia F; Sousa, Ricardo J.
Afiliação
  • Ribau AI; Department of Orthopedics, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Collins JE; Department of Orthopaedics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  • Chen AF; Department of Orthopaedics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  • Sousa RJ; Department of Orthopedics, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, Portugal; Porto Bone and Joint Infection Group (GRIP), Centro Hospitalar do Porto and Grupo TrofaSaude - Hospital em Alfena, Portugal.
J Arthroplasty ; 36(2): 752-766.e6, 2021 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32950342
BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus is a major pathogen implicated in orthopedic infections worldwide. Preoperative decolonization has been promoted but different strategies present mixed results. Thus, the goals of this study are to determine (1) whether S aureus screening and/or decolonization is effective at reducing surgical site infection in orthopedic surgery, (2) with a special focus on elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA), and (3) which preoperative S aureus screening/treatment strategy is most cost-effective for TJA. METHODS: PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases were searched on January 1, 2020, using a systematic strategy. We included papers with data comparing surgical site infection and periprosthetic joint infection rate in orthopedic surgery and/or elective total hip and knee arthroplasty patients before/after S aureus screening and/or decolonization protocol and papers evaluating the cost-effectiveness of different S aureus screening/treatment strategies. RESULTS: A total of 1260 papers were screened, and 32 papers were ultimately included. Results showed an increased risk of developing any infection (relative risk [RR] = 1.71 ± 0.16) and S aureus infection (RR = 2.79 ± 0.45) after orthopedic surgery without previous nares and whole-body decolonization. Focusing exclusively on elective TJA, there was an increased risk of developing any infection (RR = 1.70 ± 0.17) and S aureus infection (RR = 2.18 ± 0.41) if no decolonization is performed. All strategies appeared to be cost-effective, although universal decolonization without screening seemed to be the most advantageous. CONCLUSION: Preoperative S aureus screening/decolonization protocol lowered the risk of infection after elective orthopedic and TJA surgeries. However, further studies are needed to determine optimal clinical and cost-effective methodologies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Estafilocócicas / Procedimentos Ortopédicos / Artroplastia do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Estafilocócicas / Procedimentos Ortopédicos / Artroplastia do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article