Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Grenz ray and photodynamic therapy for field treatment of actinic keratoses on the forearm: A case series.
Angnardo, Lauren; Wolfe, Christopher M; Green, W Harris; Cognetta, Armand B.
Afiliação
  • Angnardo L; Division of Dermatology, Mohs Micrographic Surgery Clinic Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
  • Wolfe CM; Division of Dermatology, Mohs Micrographic Surgery Clinic Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
  • Green WH; Division of Dermatology, Mohs Micrographic Surgery Clinic Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
  • Cognetta AB; Division of Dermatology, Mohs Micrographic Surgery Clinic Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Australas J Dermatol ; 62(1): 64-68, 2021 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33040339
BACKGROUND: Actinic Keratosis is an intraepidermal neoplasm that represents the second most common reason for dermatologic visits in the United States. Sustained clearance with existing therapies is highly variable. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of combination and monotherapy with photodynamic therapy (PDT), grenz ray therapy, and PDT with microneedling (microchannel skin system) for actinic damage of the dorsal forearms and hands. METHODS: Full ethics approval was obtained through a Human Subjects Committee. Four patients with diffuse actinic field damage on their forearms and hands were recruited for the study. The dorsal forearm and hand from the elbow to the metacarpophalangeal joint were divided into four equal sections. Section 1 was treated with PDT. Section 2 was treated with grenz ray. Section 3 was treated with PDT plus microneedling. Section 4 was treated with grenz ray and PDT with microneedling. Lesion counts were recorded with transparent grids, photographed and evaluated by the same investigator at baseline, 1, 2, 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: At month 6 post treatment, lesion counts, as a per cent reduction from baseline, were 91.7% in section 1 (PDT); 97.3% in section 2 (grenz ray); 92.9% in section 3 (PDT + microneedle); and 93.9% in section 4 (grenz ray + PDT + microneedle). CONCLUSION: The greatest reduction occurred in the grenz ray monotherapy section and the second greatest reduction in the grenz ray, PDT, microneedling section. Further research on the efficacy of grenz ray therapy for field treatment of actinic keratosis of the forearms and hands is needed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fotoquimioterapia / Terapia por Raios X / Ceratose Actínica Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fotoquimioterapia / Terapia por Raios X / Ceratose Actínica Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article