Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Characterizing the Patients, Hospitals, and Data Quality of the eICU Collaborative Research Database.
O'Halloran, Heather M; Kwong, Kenneth; Veldhoen, Richard A; Maslove, David M.
Afiliação
  • O'Halloran HM; Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  • Kwong K; Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  • Veldhoen RA; Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  • Maslove DM; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Crit Care Med ; 48(12): 1737-1743, 2020 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33044284
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The eICU Collaborative Research Database is a publicly available repository of granular data from more than 200,000 ICU admissions. The quantity and variety of its entries hold promise for observational critical care research. We sought to understand better the data available within this resource to guide its future use.

DESIGN:

We conducted a descriptive analysis of the eICU Collaborative Research Database, including patient, practitioner, and hospital characteristics. We investigated the completeness of demographic and hospital data, as well as those values required to calculate an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score. We also assessed the rates of ventilation, intubation, and dialysis, and looked for potential errors in the vital sign data.

SETTING:

American ICUs that participated in the Philips Healthcare eICU program between 2014 and 2015. PATIENTS A total of 139,367 individuals who were admitted to one of the 335 participating ICUs between 2014 and 2015.

INTERVENTIONS:

None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

Most encounters were from small- and medium-sized hospitals, and managed by nonintensivists. The median ICU length of stay was 1.57 days (interquartile range, 0.82-2.97 d). The median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV-predicted ICU mortality was 2.2%, with an observed mortality of 5.4%. Rates of ventilation (20-33%), intubation (15-24%), and dialysis (3-5%) varied according to the query method used. Most vital sign readings fell into realistic ranges, with manually curated data less likely to contain implausible results than automatically entered data.

CONCLUSIONS:

Data in the eICU Collaborative Research Database are for the most part complete and plausible. Some ambiguity exists in determining which encounters are associated with various interventions, most notably mechanical ventilation. Caution is warranted in extrapolating findings from the eICU Collaborative Research Database to larger ICUs with higher acuity.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bases de Dados como Assunto / Pesquisa Biomédica / Confiabilidade dos Dados / Hospitais / Pacientes Internados / Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bases de Dados como Assunto / Pesquisa Biomédica / Confiabilidade dos Dados / Hospitais / Pacientes Internados / Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article