Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Liposomal bupivacaine interscalene nerve block in shoulder arthroplasty is not superior to plain bupivacaine: a double-blinded prospective randomized control trial.
Hattrup, Steven J; Chung, Andrew S; Rosenfeld, David M; Misra, Lopa; Koyyalamudi, Veerandra; Ritz, Matthew L; Tokish, John M.
Afiliação
  • Hattrup SJ; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA. Electronic address: hattrup.steven@mayo.edu.
  • Chung AS; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  • Rosenfeld DM; Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  • Misra L; Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  • Koyyalamudi V; Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  • Ritz ML; Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  • Tokish JM; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 30(3): 587-598, 2021 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33045330
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Interscalene brachial plexus blocks are a common modality used to provide adjunctive pain relief with shoulder replacement surgery. In 2018, the Federal Drug Administration approved the use of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) for such nerve blocks. We sought to evaluate whether this formulation of bupivacaine would provide superior pain relief for shoulder replacement patients over standard bupivacaine alone. Our hypotheses were that in the LB cohort the average postoperative pain score over the first 72 hours would be significantly lower, time to block cessation would be longer, total opioid consumption would be lower, and the average patient satisfaction score regarding their pain management would be higher. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A randomized, double-blinded study was designed comparing primary shoulder replacement surgery after an interscalene block with 25 mL of 0.5% plain bupivacaine vs. 133 mg of LB with 7.5 mL of 0.5% and 7.5 mL of 0.25% plain bupivacaine. A total of 104 patients were included in the study, with an equal number in each study arm. Patients' visual analog pain scores (VAPS) were followed for their inpatient stay, first 3 full outpatient days, and at a 3-week follow-up. Use of opioid medication was recorded for the same intervals and converted to morphine milligram equivalents. The time to first opioid rescue was documented, as well as the patients' satisfaction with their pain management at both the 3-day and 3-week intervals.

RESULTS:

No clinically relevant advantage to the use of LB over plain bupivacaine was found. During the second postoperative day, the mean VAPS was 2.4 with LB vs. 3.3 in the standard cohort (P = .0409). The only other statistically significant finding was a higher VAPS with LB during the third full day home compared with standard bupivacaine (4.0 vs. 2.8, respectively, P = .0197). Both of these differences were less than the minimal clinically important difference of 2 for the VAPS. Analysis of the VAPS for the first and third postoperative days, the first and second full days home, and at 3 weeks revealed no significant difference. Similarly, there was no significant difference in time to first opioid rescue, total morphine milligram equivalent use, and patient satisfaction with pain management.

CONCLUSION:

When used for an interscalene block to provide adjunctive pain relief in shoulder replacement surgery, the addition of LB to plain bupivacaine provides no additional clinically important benefit to the patient's pain experience over standard bupivacaine.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bloqueio do Plexo Braquial / Artroplastia do Ombro Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bloqueio do Plexo Braquial / Artroplastia do Ombro Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article