Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reprocessing of electrophysiology material in EHRA countries: an EHRA Young EP survey.
Duncker, David; Svetlosak, Martin; Guerra, Federico; Nagy, Klaudia Vivien; Vanduynhoven, Philippe; Mikhaylov, Evgeny N; Kosiuk, Jedrzej.
Afiliação
  • Duncker D; Hannover Heart Rhythm Center, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
  • Svetlosak M; Department for Arrhythmias and Cardiostimulation, National Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases, Pod Krásnou hôrkou 1, 83348 Bratislava, Slovakia.
  • Guerra F; Cardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, University Hospital 'Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I- Lancisi - Salesi', Marche Polytechnic University, via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
  • Nagy KV; Semmelweis University Heart and Vascular Center, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Vanduynhoven P; Department of Cardiology, Arrhythmia Clinic, ASZ Aalst, Aalst, Belgium.
  • Mikhaylov EN; Arrhythmia Department, Neuromodulation Laboratory, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation.
  • Kosiuk J; Department of Bioengineering Systems, Saint-Petersburg Electrotechnical University 'LETI', Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Europace ; 23(3): 479-485, 2021 03 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33083819
ABSTRACT
Data on reprocessing of electrophysiology (EP) materials are sparse. Reprocessing of catheters and other materials in daily routine varies through countries and may depend on specific material characteristics, supplier, or federal law. The aim of this study was to collect data on reprocessing usage through EHRA countries. An online survey consisting of 27 questions was distributed to EHRA Young EP members and members of national EP working groups. Two hundred and two participants from 34 EHRA countries completed the survey. One hundred and seven respondents (53.0%) reported having used and using reprocessed EP material, 30 (14.9%) respondents have used reprocessed EP material in the past but not at the time of the survey, 65 (32.2%) had never used reprocessed EP material. The most reprocessed EP materials include cables (70%), diagnostic EP catheters with deflectable (64%) or fixed curve (63%), non-irrigated ablation catheters (51%), and other conventional diagnostic catheters (41%). The most durable material was diagnostic EP catheters with a fixed curve (61%), the most sensitive material was ablation catheters with contact force sensors (21%). Important benefits were seen in reducing costs for the providing hospital (65%) and the healthcare provider (42%) and making EP procedures available for a greater number of patients (42%). Main concerns were on quality aspects (58%), contamination (52%), and loss of precision (47%). Reprocessing of EP materials is heterogeneously managed among EHRA countries. The present survey shows that European electrophysiologists consider the use of reprocessed EP material as generally safe and cost-effective.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ablação por Cateter / Eletrofisiologia Cardíaca Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ablação por Cateter / Eletrofisiologia Cardíaca Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article