Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Novel Treatment for Hemorrhagic Radiation Proctitis.
Pui, Wei Chieng; Chieng, Tiong How; Siow, Sze Li; Nik Abdullah, Nik Azim; Sagap, Ismail.
Afiliação
  • Pui WC; Department of Surgery, Sibu Hospital, Sarawak, Malaysia.
  • Chieng TH; Department of Surgery, Sarawak General Hospital(SGH), Sarawak, Malaysia.
  • Siow SL; Department of Surgery, Sibu Hospital, Sarawak, Malaysia.
  • Nik Abdullah NA; Department of Surgery, Sarawak General Hospital(SGH), Sarawak, Malaysia.
  • Sagap I; Department of Surgery, Sarawak General Hospital(SGH), Sarawak, Malaysia.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 21(10): 2927-2934, 2020 Oct 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33112550
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Various methods have been used for treatment of hemorrhagic radiation proctitis (HRP) with variable results. Currently, the preferred treatment is formalin application or endoscopic therapy with argon plasma coagulation. Recently, a novel therapy with colonic water irrigation and oral antibiotics showed promising results and more effective compared to 4% formalin application for HRP. The study objective is to compare the effect of water irrigation and oral antibiotics versus 4% formalin application in improving per rectal bleeding due to HRP and related symptoms such as diarrhoea, tenesmus, stool frequency, stool urgency and endoscopic findings.

METHODS:

We conducted a study on 34 patients with HRP and randomly assigned the patients to two treatment arm groups (n=17). The formalin group underwent 4% formalin dab and another session 4 weeks later. The irrigation group self-administered daily rectal irrigation at home for 8 weeks and consumed oral metronidazole and ciprofloxacin during the first one week. We measured the patients' symptoms and endoscopic findings before and after total of 8 weeks of treatment in both groups.

RESULTS:

Our study showed that HRP patients had reduced per rectal bleeding (p = 0.003) in formalin group, whereas irrigation group showed reduced diarrhoea (p=0.018) and tenesmus (p=0.024) symptoms. The comparison between the two treatment arms showed that irrigation technique was better than formalin technique for tenesmus (p=0.043) symptom only.

CONCLUSION:

This novel treatment showed benefit in treating HRP. It could be a new treatment option which is safe and conveniently self-administered at home or used as a combination with other therapies to improve the treatment outcome for HRP.
.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proctite / Lesões por Radiação / Radioterapia / Eletrocoagulação / Formaldeído / Hemorragia Gastrointestinal / Irrigação Terapêutica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proctite / Lesões por Radiação / Radioterapia / Eletrocoagulação / Formaldeído / Hemorragia Gastrointestinal / Irrigação Terapêutica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article