Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Complementing the active surveillance criteria with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
Kim, Tae Un; Baek, Seung Ryong; Song, Won Hoon; Nam, Jong Kil; Lee, Hyun Jung; Park, Sung Woo.
Afiliação
  • Kim TU; Department of Radiology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
  • Baek SR; Department of Urology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
  • Song WH; Department of Urology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
  • Nam JK; Department of Urology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
  • Lee HJ; Department of Pathology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
  • Park SW; Department of Urology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea. psw@pusan.ac.kr.
Investig Clin Urol ; 61(6): 573-581, 2020 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33135402
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the usefulness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to avoid misclassification of patients with clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) into active surveillance (AS). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Patients with Gleason grade group (GG) 1 PCa on systematic biopsy who underwent mpMRI before radical prostatectomy (RP) were included. mpMRI and pathologic results were compared between the AS and NOT-AS candidates. Unfavorable disease was defined as the identification of T3-4 disease or GG upgrade in the RP specimen. We established an ideal cutoff Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score for predicting unfavorable disease, and analyzed the location of index lesions on mpMRI.

RESULTS:

PI-RADS scores were not significantly different between AS candidates (n=64) and NOT-AS candidates (n=136; p=0.629). Among 64 AS candidates, GG upgrading and unfavorable disease were diagnosed after RP in 24 (37.5%) and 25 (39.1%) patients, respectively. The rate of unfavorable disease was greater for patients with a PI-RADS score of 5 (83.3%) than in those with a score ≤4 (34.5%; p=0.030). Moreover, most PI-RADS 5 lesions in AS candidates were located in the anterior half of the prostate, with GG upgrading on targeted biopsy in 75.0% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS:

Among the patients with GG 1 PCa, PI-RADS scores did not differ significantly between AS and NOT-AS candidates. Nonetheless, AS candidates with PI-RADS 5 lesions were diagnosed with unfavorable disease in >80% of RP specimens. Significant cancer located in the anterior half of the prostate including the transitional zone can be missed by systematic biopsy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Conduta Expectante / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Multiparamétrica Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Conduta Expectante / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Multiparamétrica Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article