Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Magnetic resonance imaging features of intra-articular tenosynovial giant cell tumor in children.
Nguyen, Jie C; Biko, David M; Nguyen, Michael K; Othman, Sammy; Weber, Kristy L; Ganley, Theodore J; Arkader, Alexandre.
Afiliação
  • Nguyen JC; Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. nguyenj6@email.chop.edu.
  • Biko DM; University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. nguyenj6@email.chop.edu.
  • Nguyen MK; Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
  • Othman S; University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Weber KL; Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
  • Ganley TJ; Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Arkader A; University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Pediatr Radiol ; 51(3): 441-449, 2021 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33156428
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a critical role in disease characterization of intra-articular tenosynovial giant cell tumor.

OBJECTIVE:

To characterize the MRI features of intra-articular tenosynovial giant cell tumor in children with respect to disease subtype and anatomical location. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This retrospective study included children with tenosynovial giant cell tumor who underwent preoperative MRI between January 2006 and May 2020. Two radiologists reviewed each examination to determine disease subtype, signal intensities and the presence of an effusion, osseous changes, chondromalacia, juxtacapsular disease and concomitant joint involvement. Fisher exact, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were used to compare findings between subtypes and locations.

RESULTS:

Twenty-four children (16 girls, 8 boys; mean age 13.1±3.8 years) with 19 knee and 5 ankle-hindfoot tenosynovial giant cell tumor had either diffuse (n=15) or localized (n=9) disease. An effusion (P=0.004) was significantly more common with diffuse than localized disease. There was no significant difference in MRI signal (P-range 0.09-1) or other imaging findings (P-range 0.12-0.67) between subtypes. Children with knee involvement were significantly more likely to present with diffuse disease while those with ankle-hindfoot involvement all presented with focal disease (P=0.004). Juxtacapsular (n=4) and concomitant proximal tibiofibular joint involvement (n=5) were observed with diffuse disease in the knee. Erosions (P=0.01) were significantly more common in the ankle than in the knee.

CONCLUSION:

In our study, diffuse tenosynovial giant cell tumor was more common than localized disease, particularly in the knee where juxtacapsular and concomitant proximal tibiofibular joint disease can occur.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sinovite Pigmentada Vilonodular / Tumor de Células Gigantes de Bainha Tendinosa Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sinovite Pigmentada Vilonodular / Tumor de Células Gigantes de Bainha Tendinosa Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article