Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A-qCPR risk score screening model for predicting 1-year mortality associated with hospice and palliative care in the emergency department.
Wang, Ruei-Fang; Lai, Chao-Chih; Fu, Ping-Yeh; Huang, Yung-Chung; Huang, Sheng-Jean; Chu, Dachen; Lin, Shih-Pin; Chaou, Chung-Hsien; Hsu, Chen-Yang; Chen, Hsiu-Hsi.
Afiliação
  • Wang RF; Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei.
  • Lai CC; Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei.
  • Fu PY; Master of Public Health Program, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei.
  • Huang YC; Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei.
  • Huang SJ; Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei.
  • Chu D; Superintendent, Taipei City Hospital.
  • Lin SP; Superintendent, Taipei City Hospital.
  • Chaou CH; National Yang-Ming University, Taipei.
  • Hsu CY; Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital and School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei.
  • Chen HH; Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan City.
Palliat Med ; 35(2): 408-416, 2021 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33198575
BACKGROUND: Evaluating the need for palliative care and predicting its mortality play important roles in the emergency department. AIM: We developed a screening model for predicting 1-year mortality. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify risk factors associated with 1-year mortality. Our risk scores based on these significant risk factors were then developed. Its predictive validity performance was evaluated using area under receiving operating characteristic analysis and leave-one-out cross-validation. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 15 years or older were enrolled from June 2015 to May 2016 in the emergency department. RESULTS: We identified five independent risk factors, each of which was assigned a number of points proportional to its estimated regression coefficient: age (0.05 points per year), qSOFA ⩾ 2 (1), Cancer (4), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score ⩾ 2 (2), and Do-Not-Resuscitate status (3). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of our screening tool given the cutoff larger than 3 points were 0.99 (0.98-0.99), 0.31 (0.29-0.32), 0.26 (0.24-0.27), and 0.99 (0.98-1.00), respectively. Those with screening scores larger than 9 points corresponding to 64.0% (60.0-67.9%) of 1-year mortality were prioritized for consultation and communication. The area under the receiving operating characteristic curves for the point system was 0.84 (0.83-0.85) for the cross-validation model. CONCLUSIONS: A-qCPR risk scores provide a good screening tool for assessing patient prognosis. Routine screening for end-of-life using this tool plays an important role in early and efficient physician-patient communications regarding hospice and palliative needs in the emergency department.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidados Paliativos / Hospitais para Doentes Terminais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adolescent / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidados Paliativos / Hospitais para Doentes Terminais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adolescent / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article