Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Economic evaluation of the introduction of rotavirus vaccine in Hong Kong.
Yeung, Karene Hoi Ting; Lin, Shi Lin; Clark, Andrew; McGhee, Sarah M; Janusz, Cara Bess; Atherly, Deborah; Chan, Kate C; Nelson, E Anthony S.
Afiliação
  • Yeung KHT; Department of Paediatrics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Lin SL; Department of Paediatrics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Clark A; Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • McGhee SM; School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Janusz CB; PAHO ProVac Initiative, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, United States.
  • Atherly D; Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Seattle, United States.
  • Chan KC; Department of Paediatrics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Nelson EAS; Department of Paediatrics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Electronic address: tony-nelson@cuhk.edu.hk.
Vaccine ; 39(1): 45-58, 2021 01 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33221066
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Rotavirus is a common cause of severe gastroenteritis in young children in Hong Kong (HK) with a high economic burden. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of introducing rotavirus vaccination into the HK Government's Childhood Immunisation Programme (CIP) and to include the potential protective effect of the vaccine against seizures.

METHODS:

A decision-support model was customised to estimate the potential impact, cost-effectiveness and benefit-risk of rotavirus vaccination in children below 5 years over the period 2020-2029 in HK. Two doses of Rotarix® and three doses of RotaTeq® were each compared to no vaccination. Rotavirus treatment costs were calculated from a governmental health sector perspective (i.e., costs of public sector treatment) and an overall health sector perspective (both governmental and patient, i.e., costs of public sector treatment, private sector treatment, transport and diapers). We ran probabilistic and deterministic uncertainty analyses.

RESULTS:

Introduction of rotavirus vaccination in HK could prevent 49,000 (95% uncertainty interval ~44,000-54,000) hospitalisations of rotavirus gastroenteritis and seizures and result in ~50 (95% uncertainty interval ~25-85) intussusception hospitalisations, over the period 2020-2029 (a benefit-risk ratio of ~10001), compared to a scenario with no public or private sector vaccine use. The discounted vaccination cost would be US$51-57 million over the period 2020-2029 based on per-course prices of US$72 (Rotarix®) or US$78 (RotaTeq®), but this would be offset by discounted treatment cost savings of US$70 million (government) and US$127 million (governmental and patient health sector). There was a greater than 94% probability that the vaccine could be cost-saving irrespective of the vaccine product or perspective considered. All deterministic 'what-if' scenarios were cost-saving from an overall health sector perspective (governmental and patient).

CONCLUSIONS:

Rotavirus vaccination is likely to be cost-saving and have a favourable benefit-risk profile in HK. Based on the assumptions made, our analysis supports its introduction into CIP.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por Rotavirus / Rotavirus / Vacinas contra Rotavirus Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Infant País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por Rotavirus / Rotavirus / Vacinas contra Rotavirus Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Infant País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article