Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of autofluorescence and fluorescent probes as a potential diagnostic tool for oral cancer: A systematic review.
Lima, Igor Felipe Pereira; Brand, Luiza Meurer; de Figueiredo, José Antônio Poli; Steier, Liviu; Lamers, Marcelo Lazzaron.
Afiliação
  • Lima IFP; Department of Oral Pathology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
  • Brand LM; Academic in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
  • de Figueiredo JAP; Department of Morphological Sciences, Institute of Basic Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
  • Steier L; Division of Restorative Dentistry, Penn Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Lamers ML; Department of Morphological Sciences, Institute of Basic Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. Electronic address: marcelo.lamers@ufrgs.br.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther ; 33: 102073, 2021 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33232819
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The prognosis of patients with Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) are directly related to the stage of development of the tumor at the time of diagnosis, but it is estimated an average delay in diagnosis of 2-5 months. New non-invasive techniques for the early diagnosis of OSCC are being developed, such as methodologies to detect spectral changes of tumor cells. We conducted a systematic review to analyze the potential use of autofluorescence and/or fluorescent probes for OSCC diagnosis. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science) were used as research sources. Protocol was registered with PROSPERO. It was included studies that evaluated tissue autofluorescence and/or used fluorescent probes as a method of diagnosing and/or treatment of oral cancer in humans.

RESULTS:

Forty-five studies were selected for this systematic review, of which 28 dealt only with autofluorescence, 18 on fluorescent probes and 1 evaluated both methods. The VELscope® was the most used device for autofluorescence, exhibiting sensitivity (33%-100%) and specificity (12%-88.6%). 5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) was the most used fluorescent probe, exhibiting high sensitivity (90%-100%) and specificity (51.3%-96%). Hypericin, rhodamine 6 G, rhodamine 610, porphyrin and γ-glutamyl hydroxymethyl rhodamine green have also been reported.

CONCLUSION:

Thus, the autofluorescence and fluorescent probes can provide an accurate diagnosis of oral cancer, assisting the dentist during daily clinical activity, but it is not yet possible to suggest that this method may replace histopathological examination.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fotoquimioterapia / Neoplasias Bucais / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fotoquimioterapia / Neoplasias Bucais / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article