Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perinatal and obstetric outcomes in singleton pregnancies following fresh versus cryopreserved blastocyst transfer: a meta-analysis.
Conforti, Alessandro; Picarelli, Silvia; Carbone, Luigi; La Marca, Antonio; Venturella, Roberta; Vaiarelli, Alberto; Cimadomo, Danilo; Zullo, Fulvio; Rienzi, Laura; Ubaldi, Filippo Maria; Alviggi, Carlo.
Afiliação
  • Conforti A; Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. Electronic address: alessandro.conforti@unina.it.
  • Picarelli S; Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • Carbone L; Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • La Marca A; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mother, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
  • Venturella R; Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Vaiarelli A; GENERA Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy.
  • Cimadomo D; GENERA Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy.
  • Zullo F; Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • Rienzi L; GENERA Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy.
  • Ubaldi FM; GENERA Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy.
  • Alviggi C; Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 42(2): 401-412, 2021 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33234401
ABSTRACT
The transfer of cryopreserved blastocysts is increasing in IVF centres. However, little is known about the perinatal and obstetric outcomes of this procedure. In an attempt to further elucidate these issues, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare cryopreserved transfer with fresh blastocyst embryo transfer. The results show that the risk of both preterm (odds ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.99, P = 0.04) and low birthweight births (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99, P = 0.04) was significantly lower after cryopreserved blastocyst transfer than after fresh blastocyst transfer. The rate of large for gestational age births was significantly higher (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.55-1.82, P < 0.00001) and the rate of small for gestational age births significantly lower (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.54-0.65, P < 0.00001) after cryopreserved blastocyst transfer. The transfer of cryopreserved blastocysts was associated with a significantly lower risk of placental abruption (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40-0.83, P = 0.003) but a significantly higher risk of Caesarean section (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.01-1.43, P = 0.03). In conclusion, the perinatal and obstetric outcomes associated with the transfer of cryopreserved blastocysts differ from those associated with fresh blastocyst transfer.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Blastocisto / Resultado da Gravidez / Criopreservação / Parto Obstétrico Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Blastocisto / Resultado da Gravidez / Criopreservação / Parto Obstétrico Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article