Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
"It's Case by Case, and It's a Struggle": A Qualitative Study of Hospice Practices, Perspectives, and Ethical Dilemmas When Caring for Hospice Enrollees with Full-Code Status or Intensive Treatment Preferences.
Dressler, Gabrielle; Garrett, Sarah B; Hunt, Lauren J; Thompson, Nicole; Mahoney, Katherine; Sudore, Rebecca L; Ritchie, Christine S; Harrison, Krista L.
Afiliação
  • Dressler G; Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
  • Garrett SB; Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Hunt LJ; Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Thompson N; Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Mahoney K; Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Sudore RL; Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Ritchie CS; Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Harrison KL; San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
J Palliat Med ; 24(4): 496-504, 2021 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33237830
ABSTRACT

Objective:

Characterize hospice staff practices and perspectives on discussing end-of-life care preferences with patients/families, including those desiring intensive treatment and/or full code.

Background:

Patients in the United States can elect hospice while remaining full code or seeking intensive interventions, for example, blood transfusions, or chemotherapy. These preferences conflict with professional norms, hospice philosophy, and Medicare hospice payment policies. Little is known about how hospice staff manage patient/family preferences for full-code status and intensive treatments.

Methods:

We recruited employees of four nonprofit US hospices with varying clinical and hospice experience for semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Open-ended questions explored participants' practices and perceptions of discussing end-of-life care preferences in hospice, with specific probes about intensive treatment or remaining full code. Interdisciplinary researchers coded and analyzed data using the constant comparative method.

Results:

Participants included 25% executive leaders, 14% quality improvement administrative staff, 61% clinicians (23 nurses, 21 social workers, 7 physicians, and 2 chaplains). Participants reported challenges in engaging patients/families about end-of-life care preferences. Preferences for intensive treatment or full-code status presented an ethical dilemma for some participants. Participants described strategies to navigate such preferences, including educating about treatment options, and expressed diverse reactions, including accepting or attempting to shift enrollee preferences.

Discussion:

This study illuminates a rarely studied aspect of hospice care how hospice staff engage with enrollees choosing full code and/or intensive treatments. Such patient preferences can produce ethical dilemmas for hospice staff. Enhanced communication training and guidelines, updated organizational and federal policies, and ethics consult services may mitigate these dilemmas.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Assistência Terminal / Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida / Hospitais para Doentes Terminais Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Limite: Aged / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Assistência Terminal / Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida / Hospitais para Doentes Terminais Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Limite: Aged / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article