Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development and validation of a simple stone score to estimate the probability of residual stones prior to percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Harraz, Ahmed M; El-Nahas, Ahmed R; Nabeeh, Mohamed A; Laymon, Mahmoud; Sheir, Khalid Z; El-Kappany, Hamdy A; Osman, Yasser.
Afiliação
  • Harraz AM; Urology and Nephrology Center, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt - harraza@mans.edu.eg.
  • El-Nahas AR; Urology and Nephrology Center, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt.
  • Nabeeh MA; Urology and Nephrology Center, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt.
  • Laymon M; Urology and Nephrology Center, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt.
  • Sheir KZ; Urology and Nephrology Center, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt.
  • El-Kappany HA; Urology and Nephrology Center, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt.
  • Osman Y; Urology and Nephrology Center, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt.
Minerva Urol Nephrol ; 73(4): 525-531, 2021 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33256360
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The aim of the present study was to develop and internally validate a simple stone score (SSS) to estimate the probability of clinically significant residual fragments (CSRF) prior to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL).

METHODS:

The files of 1170 PNL procedures between January and December 2015 were evaluated. CT-derived stone characteristics were examined. Caliceal stone distribution (CSD) was assigned three grades based on the number of calices involved regardless of the renal pelvis (I = no or single calix; II = more than one calix; and III = more than 2 calices or complete staghorn stones). CSRF was defined as any residuals >4 mm in postoperative CT. A logistic regression model to predict the CSRF was fitted, and coefficients were used to develop the SSS. The SSS was validated by discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS:

Patients' data were split into training (936, 80%) and validating (234, 20%) datasets. In the training partition, independent predictors of CSRF were CSD-grade II (OR 4.2; 95%CI 2.5-7; P<0.001), grade III (OR 7.8; 95%CI 4.2-14.4; P<0.001) and largest stone diameter (LSD) (OR1.3; 95%CI 1.1-1.6; P<0.001). Score points 0, 1, 2, and 0, 3, 9 were given to LSD<30, 30-40, >40 mm, and CSD grades I, II, III, respectively. Discrimination of the SSS was 0.79 and after 10-fold cross-validation and internal validation was 0.86. The calibration plot and DCA highlighted the validity and clinical significance of the SSS.

CONCLUSIONS:

The novel SSS could be used to describe the risk of CSRF prior to PNL. Further studies are invited for external validation.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cálculos Renais / Cálculos Coraliformes / Nefrolitotomia Percutânea Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cálculos Renais / Cálculos Coraliformes / Nefrolitotomia Percutânea Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article