Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of endoscopic vacuum therapy as rescue treatment in refractory leaks after gastro-esophageal surgery.
De Pasqual, Carlo Alberto; Mengardo, Valentina; Tomba, Francesco; Veltri, Alessandro; Sacco, Michele; Giacopuzzi, Simone; Weindelmayer, Jacopo; de Manzoni, Giovanni.
Afiliação
  • De Pasqual CA; General and Upper GI Surgery Division, University of Verona, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37124, Verona, Italy.
  • Mengardo V; General and Upper GI Surgery Division, University of Verona, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37124, Verona, Italy. valentina.mengardo@gmail.com.
  • Tomba F; Department of Emergency Surgical Endoscopy, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37124, Verona, Italy.
  • Veltri A; General and Upper GI Surgery Division, University of Verona, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37124, Verona, Italy.
  • Sacco M; General and Upper GI Surgery Division, University of Verona, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37124, Verona, Italy.
  • Giacopuzzi S; General and Upper GI Surgery Division, University of Verona, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37124, Verona, Italy.
  • Weindelmayer J; General and Upper GI Surgery Division, University of Verona, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37124, Verona, Italy.
  • de Manzoni G; General and Upper GI Surgery Division, University of Verona, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37124, Verona, Italy.
Updates Surg ; 73(2): 607-614, 2021 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33258044
ABSTRACT
The treatment of leak after esophageal and gastric surgery is a major challenge. Over the last few years, endoscopic vacuum therapy (E-VAC) has gained popularity in the management of this life-threatening complication. We reported our initial experience on E-VAC therapy as rescue treatment in refractory anastomotic leak and perforation after gastro-esophageal surgery. From September 2017 to December 2019, a total of 8 E-VAC therapies were placed as secondary treatment in 7 patients. Six for anastomotic leak (3 cervical, 1 thoracic, 2 abdominal) and 1 for perforation of the gastric conduit. In 6 cases, E-VAC was placed intracavitary; while in the remaining 2, the sponge was positioned intraluminal (one patient was treated with both approaches). A total of 60 sponges were used in the whole cohort. The median number of sponge insertions was 10 (range 5-14) with a median treatment duration of 41 days (range 19-49). A complete healing was achieved in 4 intracavitary (67%) and in 1 intraluminal (50%) E-VAC. We observed only one E-VAC-related complication a bleeding successfully managed endoscopically. E-VAC therapy seems to be a safe and effective tool in the management of leaks and perforations after upper GI surgery, although with longer healing time when it is used as secondary treatment.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article