Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What is the minimum response rate on patient-reported outcome measures needed to adequately evaluate total hip arthroplasties?
Pronk, Yvette; van der Weegen, Walter; Vos, Rein; Brinkman, Justus-Martijn; van Heerwaarden, Ronald Johannes; Pilot, Peter.
Afiliação
  • Pronk Y; Research Department, Kliniek ViaSana, Hoogveldseweg 1, 5451 AA, Mill, The Netherlands. y.pronk@viasana.nl.
  • van der Weegen W; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sint Anna Ziekenhuis, Bogardeind 2, 5664 EH, Geldrop, The Netherlands.
  • Vos R; Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6229 HA, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Brinkman JM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kliniek ViaSana, Hoogveldseweg 1, 5451 AA, Mill, The Netherlands.
  • van Heerwaarden RJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kliniek ViaSana, Hoogveldseweg 1, 5451 AA, Mill, The Netherlands.
  • Pilot P; Stichting IMA, Kanaaldijk 10, 6116 AD, Roosteren, The Netherlands.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 18(1): 379, 2020 Dec 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33267842
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Unknown is which response rate on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is needed to both obtain an accurate outcome and ensure generalizability in evaluating total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures. Without an evidence based minimum response rate (MRR) on THA PROMs, it is possible that hospitals report invalid patient-reported outcomes (PROs) due to a too low response rate. Alternatively, hospitals may invest too much in achieving an unnecessary high response rate. The aim of this study is to gain an insight into the MRR on PROMs needed to adequately evaluate THA procedures from a clinical perspective.

METHODS:

Retrospective study on prospective collected data of primary, elective THA procedures was performed. MRR was investigated for each PROM (NRS pain at rest, NRS pain during activity, EQ-5D-3L, HOOS-PS, anchor function, OHS, anchor pain and NRS satisfaction) separately to calculate the primary

outcome:

MRR for the THA PROMs set. MRR on a PROM needed to have (condition 1.) similar PRO change score (3 month score minus preoperative score) including confidence interval, (condition 2.) maintaining the influence of each change score predictor and (condition 3.) equal distribution of each predictor, as those of a 100% PROM response rate group. Per PROM, a 100%-group was identified with all patients having the PRO change score. Randomly assessed groups of 90% till 10% response rate (in total 90 groups) were compared with the 100%-group. Linear mixed model analyses and linear regressions were executed.

RESULTS:

The MRR for the THA PROMs set was 100% (range 70-100% per PROM). The first condition resulted in a MRR of 60%, the second condition in a MRR of 100% and the third condition in a MRR of 10%.

CONCLUSIONS:

A 100% response rate on PROMs is needed in order to adequately evaluate THA procedures from a clinical perspective. All stakeholders using THA PROs should be aware that 100% of the THA patients should respond on both preoperative and 3 month postoperative PROMs. For now, taking the first step in improving evaluation of THA for quality control by achieving at least two of the three conditions of MRR, advised is to require a response rate on PROMs of 60% as the lower limit.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Pós-Operatória / Artroplastia de Quadril / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Pós-Operatória / Artroplastia de Quadril / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article