Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of needle positioning on ablation success of irreversible electroporation: a unicentric retrospective analysis.
Mathy, René Michael; Tinoush, Parham; da Florencia, Ricardo Daniel; Braun, Alexander; Ghamarnejad, Omid; Radeleff, Boris; Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich; Chang, De-Hua.
Afiliação
  • Mathy RM; Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. Rene.Mathy@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
  • Tinoush P; Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • da Florencia RD; Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Braun A; Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Ghamarnejad O; Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Radeleff B; Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Kauczor HU; Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Chang DH; Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 21902, 2020 12 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33318515
ABSTRACT
Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an ablation procedure in which cell death is induced by ultrashort electrical pulses. In this unicentric retrospective study we investigated the influence of needle positioning on ablation success. 15 IREs with residual tumor after ablation, detected in the first follow-up MRI, were included, and compared with 30 successful ablations. Evaluation of needle geometry revealed significantly higher values for needle divergence (NDiv, 7.0° vs. 3.7°, p = 0.02), tumor-center-to-ablation-center distance (TACD, 11.6 vs. 3.2 mm, p < 0.001), tumor-to-needle distance (4.7 vs. 1.9 mm, p = 0.04), and tumor diameter per needle (7.5 vs. 5.9 mm/needle, p = 0.01) in patients with residual tumor. The average number of needles used was higher in the group without residual tumor after ablation (3.1 vs. 2.4, p = 0.04). In many cases with residual tumor, needle depth was too short (2.1 vs. 6.8 mm tumor overlap beyond the most proximal needle tip, p < 0.01). The use of a stereotactic navigation system in 10 cases resulted in a lower NDiv value (2.1° vs. 5.6°, p < 0.01). Thus, correct needle placement seems to be a crucial factor for success and the assistance of a stereotactic navigation system might be helpful. As most important geometrical parameter TACD could be identified. Main reasons for high TACD were insufficient needle depth and a lesion location out of the needle plane.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Eletroporação / Carcinoma Hepatocelular / Neoplasias Hepáticas / Agulhas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Eletroporação / Carcinoma Hepatocelular / Neoplasias Hepáticas / Agulhas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article