Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Initial Experience, Safety, and Feasibility of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
Padala, Santosh K; Master, Vivak M; Terricabras, Maria; Chiocchini, Andrea; Garg, Aatish; Kron, Jordana; Shepard, Richard; Kalahasty, Gautham; Azizi, Zahara; Tsang, Bernice; Khaykin, Yaariv; Pantano, Alfredo; Koneru, Jayanthi N; Ellenbogen, Kenneth A; Verma, Atul.
Afiliação
  • Padala SK; Division of Cardiology, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA. Electronic address: santosh.padala@vcuhealth.org.
  • Master VM; Division of Cardiology, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
  • Terricabras M; Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Chiocchini A; Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Garg A; Division of Cardiology, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
  • Kron J; Division of Cardiology, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
  • Shepard R; Division of Cardiology, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
  • Kalahasty G; Division of Cardiology, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
  • Azizi Z; Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Tsang B; Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Khaykin Y; Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Pantano A; Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Koneru JN; Division of Cardiology, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
  • Ellenbogen KA; Division of Cardiology, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
  • Verma A; Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol ; 6(14): 1773-1782, 2020 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33357573
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This study sought to evaluate the safety and feasibility of conduction system pacing by performing left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP).

BACKGROUND:

There are limited data from single centers showing that LBBAP may circumvent the technical and electrophysiological challenges encountered with His bundle pacing.

METHODS:

Patients referred for pacemaker implantation at 2 centers between February 1, 2019, and March 31, 2020, were considered for LBBAP. LBBAP was performed by implanting a lumen-less, exposed helix lead approximately 2 cm distal to the His bundle and deep into the septum using a specialized delivery sheath. Implant success rates, complications, and electrophysiological parameters were assessed.

RESULTS:

LBBAP was successful in 305 of 341 patients (89%). Mean age was 72 ± 12 years; 45% were women; and 39% had QRS duration (QRSd) >130 ms, 22% right bundle branch block, 11% left bundle branch block, and 6% intraventricular conduction defect. Pacing indications were sinus node dysfunction in 28.7%, atrioventricular block in 52.5%, cardiac resynchronization therapy in 8.8%, and refractory atrial fibrillation in 10% of patients. Procedural duration was 74.7 ± 34 min and fluoroscopic time was 10.4 ± 8.1 min. The mean baseline QRSd and paced QRSd in the overall cohort was 114 ± 29.8 ms versus 112 ± 11.7 ms (p < 0.001) and in patients with infra-Hisian disease was 144.5 ± 19 ms versus 115 ± 12 ms (p < 0.001), respectively. Mean left ventricular activation time was 71.7 ± 11 ms at high output and 74.7 ± 11 ms at low output. LBB potentials were noted in 41% patients. Pacing threshold and R waves were 0.74 ± 0.3 V at 0.4 ms and 10.7 ± 4.9 mV at time of implantation and were stable at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups. The only major complications were 3 LBBAP lead dislodgements, 2 within 24 h and 1 at 2 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS:

LBBA pacing is safe, feasible, and a reliable alternative to His bundle pacing for providing physiological pacing. Randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm the safety, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of LBBAP.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Eletrocardiografia / Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Eletrocardiografia / Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article