Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Absence of contrast enhancement in a petroclival meningioma: Case report and systematic literature review.
Adepoju, Adedamola; Narayan, Ananth; Aldyab, Mahmoud; Foyt, David; Peris-Celda, Maria.
Afiliação
  • Adepoju A; Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, United States.
  • Narayan A; Department of Radiology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, United States.
  • Aldyab M; Department of Pathology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, United States.
  • Foyt D; Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, United States.
  • Peris-Celda M; Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, United States.
Surg Neurol Int ; 11: 418, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33365181
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Meningioma is one of the most common intracranial tumors with well-established radiologic features such as contrast enhancement, dural tail, and hyperostosis on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Contrast enhancement is usually homogeneous or heterogeneous based on tumor vascularity and underlying histopathology. Even in this context, faint or nonenhancing meningioma is exceedingly rare. CASE DESCRIPTION A 57-year-old male presented with progressive right hearing loss, disequilibrium, occasional difficulty swallowing, and facial numbness. Imaging demonstrated an extensive hypodense, nonenhancing right cerebellopontine angle mass extending from the interpeduncular, and ambient cisterns to the foramen magnum. The pathological analysis demonstrated a microcystic meningioma WHO Grade I. There are few reported case reports or series of minimal or nonenhancing meningiomas, and a systematic review was performed for these cases. Seven peer-reviewed articles with 14 verifiable cases were identified and reviewed for radiologic features, tumor location, and tumor classification. The majority of minimal or nonenhancing meningiomas were microcystic, and most of them located at the convexity. This is the second case reported of a nonenhancing meningioma at the cerebellopontine angle and petroclival region.

CONCLUSION:

Meningioma should be considered a differential diagnosis for nonenhancing lesion at the cerebellopontine and petroclival regions.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article