Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improving the Assessment of Flow-Mediated Dilation Through Detection of Peak Time in Healthy Subjects and Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes.
Herbrand, Theresa; Coester, Hans-Veit; Sansone, Roberto; Fischer, Annelie; Heiss, Christian; Heise, Tim; Kelm, Malte; DeVries, J Hans.
Afiliação
  • Herbrand T; Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung GmbH, Neuss, Germany.
  • Coester HV; Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung GmbH, Neuss, Germany.
  • Sansone R; Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
  • Fischer A; Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung GmbH, Neuss, Germany.
  • Heiss C; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, 3660University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
  • Heise T; Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung GmbH, Neuss, Germany.
  • Kelm M; Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
  • DeVries JH; Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung GmbH, Neuss, Germany.
Angiology ; 72(5): 434-441, 2021 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33380161
ABSTRACT
The assessment of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is widely used to quantify endothelial function. Historically, FMD was determined at 60 seconds post-cuff deflation. We investigated whether FMD would be more accurate if determined at maximum dilatory peak (MDP) than at 60 seconds in healthy subjects and subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We studied 95 healthy and 72 subjects with T2DM and assessed FMD at MDP, 60 and 90 seconds. Twenty-four healthy and 12 subjects with T2DM underwent a repeat FMD after 28 days. In healthy subjects, FMD at MDP was higher than at 60 and 90 seconds, with mean difference MDP versus 60 seconds 1.14% (95% CI 0.6-1.7); P < .0001 and MDP versus 90 seconds 1.9% (95% CI 1.3-2.5) with similar results in T2DM, that is, 1.0% (95% CI 0.1-1.9) and 2.3% (95% CI 1.3-3.2), respectively. Intraindividual variability was lowest with MDP compared with 60 and 90 seconds, that is, 15.0 versus 23.2% and 40.0%, respectively, resulting in a more than 2-fold reduction in necessary sample size. In healthy subjects and subjects with T2DM, assessment of FMD using MDP results in a more accurate and precise assessment leading to a substantial reduction in sample size.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vasodilatação / Artéria Braquial / Ultrassonografia / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Angiopatias Diabéticas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vasodilatação / Artéria Braquial / Ultrassonografia / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Angiopatias Diabéticas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article