Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Towards a systematic use of effect biomarkers in population and occupational biomonitoring.
Zare Jeddi, Maryam; Hopf, Nancy B; Viegas, Susana; Price, Anna Bal; Paini, Alicia; van Thriel, Christoph; Benfenati, Emilio; Ndaw, Sophie; Bessems, Jos; Behnisch, Peter A; Leng, Gabriele; Duca, Radu-Corneliu; Verhagen, Hans; Cubadda, Francesco; Brennan, Lorraine; Ali, Imran; David, Arthur; Mustieles, Vicente; Fernandez, Mariana F; Louro, Henriqueta; Pasanen-Kase, Robert.
Afiliação
  • Zare Jeddi M; Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Italy.
  • Hopf NB; Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Epalinges, Switzerland.
  • Viegas S; NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 1600-560 Lisbon, Portugal; Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), 1150-090 Lisbon, Portugal; H&TRC-Health & Technology Research Center, ESTeSL-Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde, Inst
  • Price AB; European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
  • Paini A; European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
  • van Thriel C; Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the Technical University of Dortmund (IfADo), Ardeystrasse 67, 44139 Dortmund, Germany.
  • Benfenati E; Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology, Istituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via La Masa, 19, 20156 Milano, Italy.
  • Ndaw S; INRS-French National Research and Safety Institute, France.
  • Bessems J; VITO - Flemish Institute for Technological Research, Belgium.
  • Behnisch PA; BioDetection Systems b.v., Science Park 406, 1098 XH Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Leng G; Currenta GmbH Co. OHG, Institute of Biomonitoring, Leverkusen, Germany.
  • Duca RC; Unit Environmental Hygiene and Human Biological Monitoring, Department of Health Protection, National Health Laboratory, Dudelange, Luxembourg.
  • Verhagen H; Food Safety & Nutrition Consultancy (FSNConsultancy), Zeist, the Netherlands.
  • Cubadda F; Istituto Superiore di Sanità-National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
  • Brennan L; School of Agriculture and Food Science, Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Ali I; Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • David A; Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail)-UMR_S 1085, F-35000 Rennes, France.
  • Mustieles V; University of Granada, Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), Granada, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology & Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
  • Fernandez MF; University of Granada, Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), Granada, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology & Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
  • Louro H; National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Department of Human Genetics, Lisboa and ToxOmics - Centre for Toxicogenomics and Human Health, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Pasanen-Kase R; State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO), Labour Directorate Section Chemicals and Work (ABCH), Switzerland. Electronic address: robert.pasanen-kase@seco.admin.ch.
Environ Int ; 146: 106257, 2021 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33395925
Effect biomarkers can be used to elucidate relationships between exposure to environmental chemicals and their mixtures with associated health outcomes, but they are often underused, as underlying biological mechanisms are not understood. We aim to provide an overview of available effect biomarkers for monitoring chemical exposures in the general and occupational populations, and highlight their potential in monitoring humans exposed to chemical mixtures. We also discuss the role of the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework and physiologically based kinetic and dynamic (PBK/D) modelling to strengthen the understanding of the biological mechanism of effect biomarkers, and in particular for use in regulatory risk assessments. An interdisciplinary network of experts from the European chapter of the International Society for Exposure Science (ISES Europe) and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Occupational Biomonitoring activity of Working Parties of Hazard and Exposure Assessment group worked together to map the conventional framework of biomarkers and provided recommendations for their systematic use. We summarized the key aspects of this work here, and discussed these in three parts. Part I, we inventory available effect biomarkers and promising new biomarkers for the general population based on the H2020 Human Biomonitoring for Europe (HBM4EU) initiative. Part II, we provide an overview AOP and PBK/D modelling use that improved the selection and interpretation of effect biomarkers. Part III, we describe the collected expertise from the OECD Occupational Biomonitoring subtask effect biomarkers in prioritizing relevant mode of actions (MoAs) and suitable effect biomarkers. Furthermore, we propose a tiered risk assessment approach for occupational biomonitoring. Several effect biomarkers, especially for use in occupational settings, are validated. They offer a direct assessment of the overall health risks associated with exposure to chemicals, chemical mixtures and their transformation products. Promising novel effect biomarkers are emerging for biomonitoring of the general population. Efforts are being dedicated to prioritizing molecular and biochemical effect biomarkers that can provide a causal link in exposure-health outcome associations. This mechanistic approach has great potential in improving human health risk assessment. New techniques such as in silico methods (e.g. QSAR, PBK/D modelling) as well as 'omics data will aid this process. Our multidisciplinary review represents a starting point for enhancing the identification of effect biomarkers and their mechanistic pathways following the AOP framework. This may help in prioritizing the effect biomarker implementation as well as defining threshold limits for chemical mixtures in a more structured way. Several ex vivo biomarkers have been proposed to evaluate combined effects including genotoxicity and xeno-estrogenicity. There is a regulatory need to derive effect-based trigger values using the increasing mechanistic knowledge coming from the AOP framework to address adverse health effects due to exposure to chemical mixtures. Such a mechanistic strategy would reduce the fragmentation observed in different regulations. It could also stimulate a harmonized use of effect biomarkers in a more comparable way, in particular for risk assessments to chemical mixtures.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Exposição Ambiental / Monitoramento Biológico Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Exposição Ambiental / Monitoramento Biológico Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article