Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Neuroprotection by Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Rodent Models of Focal Ischemia: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Ripley, Allyson J; Jeffers, Matthew S; McDonald, Matthew W; Montroy, Joshua; Dykes, Angela; Fergusson, Dean A; Silasi, Gergely; Lalu, Manoj M; Corbett, Dale.
Afiliação
  • Ripley AJ; Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Jeffers MS; Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
  • McDonald MW; Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Montroy J; Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Dykes A; Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Fergusson DA; Canadian Vascular Network Scholar, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Silasi G; Clinical Epidemiology Program, BLUEPRINT Translational Research Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Lalu MM; Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Corbett D; Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery, Ottawa, Canada.
Transl Stroke Res ; 12(3): 461-473, 2021 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33405011
Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a promising neuroprotective therapy for ischemic stroke. Preclinical studies investigating RIC have shown RIC reduced infarct volume, but clinical trials have been equivocal. Therefore, the efficacy of RIC in reducing infarct volume and quality of current literature needs to be evaluated to identify knowledge gaps to support future clinical trials. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature involving RIC in rodent models of focal ischemia. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019145441). Eligibility criteria included rat or mice models of focal ischemia that received RIC to a limb either before, during, or after stroke. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from 1946 to August 2019. Risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE risk of bias tool along with construct validity. Seventy-two studies were included in the systematic review. RIC was shown to reduce infarct volume (SMD - 2.19; CI - 2.48 to - 1.91) when compared to stroke-only controls and no adverse events were reported with regard to RIC. Remote ischemic conditioning was shown to be most efficacious in males (SMD - 2.26; CI - 2.58 to - 1.94) and when delivered poststroke (SMD - 1.34; CI - 1.95 to - 0.73). A high risk of bias was present; thus, measures of efficacy may be exaggerated. A limitation is the poor methodological reporting of many studies, resulting in unclear construct validity. We identified several important, but under investigated topics including the efficacy of RIC in different stroke models, varied infarct sizes and location, and potential sex differences.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Precondicionamento Isquêmico / Acidente Vascular Cerebral Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Precondicionamento Isquêmico / Acidente Vascular Cerebral Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article