Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Nobody ever questions-Polypharmacy in care homes: A mixed methods evaluation of a multidisciplinary medicines optimisation initiative.
Jordan, Sue; Prout, Hayley; Carter, Neil; Dicomidis, John; Hayes, Jamie; Round, Jeffrey; Carson-Stevens, Andrew.
Afiliação
  • Jordan S; Faculty of Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
  • Prout H; Centre for Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.
  • Carter N; Faculty of Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
  • Dicomidis J; Care Home Governance and National Lead Pharmacy Informatics, Pontypool, Wales, United Kingdom.
  • Hayes J; School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.
  • Round J; Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Carson-Stevens A; Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.
PLoS One ; 16(1): e0244519, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33411824
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Nurse-led monitoring of patients for signs and symptoms associated with documented 'undesirable effects' of medicines has potential to prevent avoidable harm, and optimise prescribing. INTERVENTION The Adverse Drug Reaction Profile for polypharmacy (ADRe-p) identifies and documents putative adverse effects of medicines commonly prescribed in primary care. Nurses address some problems, before passing ADRe-p to pharmacists and prescribers for review, in conjunction with prescriptions.

OBJECTIVES:

We investigated changes in the number and nature of residents' problems as recorded on ADRe-p; prescription regimens; medicines optimisation and healthcare costs. We explored aetiologies of problems identified and stakeholders' perspectives. SETTING AND

PARTICIPANTS:

In three UK care homes, 19 residents completed the study, December 2018 to May 2019. Two service users, three pharmacists, six nurses gave interviews.

METHODS:

This mixed-method process evaluation integrated data from residents' ADRe-ps and medicines charts, at the study's start and 5-10 weeks later.

RESULTS:

We recruited three of 27 homes approached and 26 of 45 eligible residents; 19 completed ADRe-p at least twice. Clinical gains were identified for 17/19 residents (mean number of symptoms 3 SD 1.67, range 0-7). Examples included management of pain (six residents), seizures (three), dyspnoea (one), diarrhoea (laxatives reduced, two), falls (two of five able to stand). One or more medicine was de-prescribed or dose reduced for 12/19 residents. ADRe administration and review cost ~£30 in staff time. ADRe-p helped carers and nurses bring residents' problems to the attention of prescribers. IMPLICATIONS ADRe-p relieved unnecessary suffering. It supported carers and nurses by providing a tool to engage with pharmacists and prescribers, and was the only observable strategy for multidisciplinary team working around medicines optimisation. ADRe-p improved care by a) regular systematic checks and problem documentation; b) information transfer from care home staff to prescribers and pharmacists; c) recording changes. REGISTRATION NLM Identifier NCT03955133; ClinicalTrials.gov.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Polimedicação / Estudos Interdisciplinares / Casas de Saúde Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Polimedicação / Estudos Interdisciplinares / Casas de Saúde Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article