Impact of targeted pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy in patients with combined post- and precapillary pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Combined post- and precapillary pulmonary hypertension (CpcPH) portends poor outcomes in pulmonary hypertension related to left heart disease (PH-LHD). While recent evidence does not support the use of targeted pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) therapy in PH-LHD, there is a lack of clinical data on their use in CpcPH. We evaluated the outcomes in patients with CpcPH treated with PAH therapies. METHODS: Retrospectively, 50 patients meeting hemodynamic criteria of CpcPH and started on PAH-targeted drugs were identified. Fifty age- and gender-matched PAH patients were chosen as controls. We evaluated the change in 6-minute walk distance, World Health Organization functional class (FC), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, BNP or NT-proBNP, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: After adjusting for age and gender, there was no improvement in World Health Organization FC in CpcPH over 2 years (odds ratio of change to FC I/II 1.01, 95% CI: 0.98-1.04). There was no significant improvement in 6-minute walk distance (ß coefficient 0.21, 95% CI: -0.98 to 1.4), reduction in BNP/NT-proBNP (ß coefficient -12.16, 95% CI: -30.68 to 6.37), increase in tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (ß coefficient 0.074, 95% CI: 0.010-0.139), or decrease in pulmonary artery systolic pressure (0.996, 95% CI: 0.991-1.011) in CpcPH with therapy. There was higher mortality in CpcPH compared to PAH on treatment (24% vs 4%, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: There were no improvements in symptoms, exercise capacity, or echocardiographic parameters with PAH-targeted therapy in CpcPH. Further studies into potential treatments benefiting this population are needed.