Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Training Thoracic Ultrasound Skills: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulation-Based Training versus Training on Healthy Volunteers.
Pietersen, Pia Iben; Jørgensen, Rasmus; Graumann, Ole; Konge, Lars; Skaarup, Søren Helbo; Lawaetz Schultz, Hans Henrik; Laursen, Christian B.
Afiliação
  • Pietersen PI; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark, pia.iben.pietersen3@rsyd.dk.
  • Jørgensen R; Regional Center for Technical Simulation, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark, pia.iben.pietersen3@rsyd.dk.
  • Graumann O; Institute for Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark, pia.iben.pietersen3@rsyd.dk.
  • Konge L; OPEN, Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark, pia.iben.pietersen3@rsyd.dk.
  • Skaarup SH; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  • Lawaetz Schultz HH; Regional Center for Technical Simulation, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  • Laursen CB; Institute for Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Respiration ; 100(1): 34-43, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33454705
INTRODUCTION: As ultrasound becomes more accessible, the use of point-of-care ultrasound examinations performed by clinicians has increased. Sufficient theoretical and practical skills are prerequisites to integrate thoracic ultrasound into a clinical setting and to use it as supplement in the clinical decision-making. Recommendations on how to educate and train clinicians for these ultrasound examinations are debated, and simulation-based training may improve clinical performance. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore the effect of simulation-based training in thoracic ultrasound compared to training on healthy volunteers. METHOD: A total of 66 physicians with no previous experience in thoracic ultrasound completed a training program and assessment of competences from November 2018 to May 2019. After a theoretical session in ultrasound physics, sonoanatomy, and thoracic ultrasound, the physicians were randomized into one of three groups for practical training: (1) simulation-based training, (2) training on a healthy volunteer, or (3) no training (control group). Primary outcome was difference in the clinical performance score after the training period. RESULTS: Using a multiple comparison, ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for multiplicity, there was no statistical significant difference between the two trained groups' performance score: 45.1 points versus 41.9 points (minimum 17 points, maximum 68 points; p = 0.38). The simulation-based training group scored significantly higher than the control group without hands-on training, 36.7 points (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: The use of simulation-based training in thoracic ultrasound does not improve the clinical performance score compared to conventional training on healthy volunteers. As focused, thoracic ultrasound is a relatively uncomplicated practical procedure when taught; focus should mainly be on the theoretical part and the supervised clinical training in a curriculum. However, simulation can be used instead or as an add-on to training on simulated patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Respiratórias / Simulação por Computador / Ultrassonografia / Educação / Educação Médica Continuada / Treinamento por Simulação Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Respiratórias / Simulação por Computador / Ultrassonografia / Educação / Educação Médica Continuada / Treinamento por Simulação Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article