Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development and Cost Analysis of a Lung Nodule Management Strategy Combining Artificial Intelligence and Lung-RADS for Baseline Lung Cancer Screening.
Adams, Scott J; Mondal, Prosanta; Penz, Erika; Tyan, Chung-Chun; Lim, Hyun; Babyn, Paul.
Afiliação
  • Adams SJ; Department of Medical Imaging, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. Electronic address: scott.adams@usask.ca.
  • Mondal P; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
  • Penz E; Division of Respirology, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
  • Tyan CC; Division of Respirology, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
  • Lim H; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
  • Babyn P; Department of Medical Imaging, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 18(5): 741-751, 2021 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33482120
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To develop a lung nodule management strategy combining the Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) with an artificial intelligence (AI) malignancy risk score and determine its impact on follow-up investigations and associated costs in a baseline lung cancer screening population. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Secondary analysis was undertaken of a data set consisting of AI malignancy risk scores and Lung-RADS classifications from six radiologists for 192 baseline low-dose CT studies. Low-dose CT studies were weighted to model a representative cohort of 3,197 baseline screening patients. An AI risk score threshold was defined to match average sensitivity of six radiologists applying Lung-RADS. Cases initially Lung-RADS category 1 or 2 with a high AI risk score were upgraded to category 3, and cases initially category 3 or higher with a low AI risk score were downgraded to category 2. Follow-up investigations resulting from Lung-RADS and the AI-informed management strategy were determined. Investigation costs were based on the 2019 US Medicare Physician Fee Schedule.

RESULTS:

The AI-informed management strategy achieved sensitivity and specificity of 91% and 96%, respectively. Average sensitivity and specificity of six radiologists using Lung-RADS only was 91% and 66%, respectively. Using the AI-informed management strategy, 41 (0.2%) category 1 or 2 classifications were upgraded to category 3, and 5,750 (30%) category 3 or higher classifications were downgraded to category 2. Minimum net cost savings using the AI-informed management strategy was estimated to be $72 per patient screened.

CONCLUSION:

Using an AI risk score combined with Lung-RADS at baseline lung cancer screening may result in fewer follow-up investigations and substantial cost savings.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article