Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions: outcomes from a United States experience.
Gupta, Nina; Rodríguez-Ruiz, Gabriela; Siddiqui, Uzma D; Chapman, Christopher G; Donboli, Kianoush; Hart, John; Xiao, Shu-Yuan; Waxman, Irving.
Afiliação
  • Gupta N; Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. ngupta9@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.
  • Rodríguez-Ruiz G; Hospital Central Norte Petróleos Mexicanos, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Siddiqui UD; Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Chapman CG; Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Donboli K; Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Hart J; Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Xiao SY; Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Waxman I; Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Surg Endosc ; 36(1): 236-243, 2022 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33523276
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND STUDY

AIMS:

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is commonly used in Asia for resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) and early (T1) colorectal cancers. It allows for en bloc removal and is often curative. We describe outcomes of colorectal ESD from a United States (US) academic medical center and compare this to international experiences.

METHODS:

Retrospective review was performed of colonic lesions referred to the University of Chicago Medical Center for ESD from 2012 to 2020. Clinical and procedural data were collected.

RESULTS:

The study included 78 lesions with mean size of 29.7 mm (range 10-100 mm). The overall en bloc resection rate was 73.1% (n = 57). Between the first and second half of the study, it improved from 61.5 to 84.6% (p = 0.02). Histology showed adenocarcinoma in fifteen lesions (19.2%). Of all neoplastic lesions (n = 68), resection with negative margins (R0) was achieved in 54 cases (79.4%). Adverse events occurred in 9 cases (11.5%), but most (n = 6, 66.7%) were successfully treated endoscopically. Follow-up endoscopy was performed in 46 patients (59.0%) at a mean interval of 6.8 months (SD ± 5.0 months) with two case of recurrent lesion (4.3%).

CONCLUSIONS:

This study shows successful colorectal ESD outcomes at a US tertiary center. The en bloc resection rate was lower than other cohorts, but a learning curve was demonstrated. The R0 resection, lesion recurrence, and adverse event rates were similar to other non-Asian experiences, but not as favorable as in Asia [Fuccio et al. in Gastrointest Endosc 8674-86.e17, 2017]. Increased ESD training in the US can help optimize utilization and outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Adenocarcinoma / Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Adenocarcinoma / Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article