Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A negative breakdown test in a fragrance mix I-positive patient does not rule out contact allergy to its fragrance constituents.
Geier, Johannes; Schubert, Steffen; Schnuch, Axel; Szliska, Christiane; Weisshaar, Elke; Kränke, Birger; Werfel, Thomas; Ruëff, Franziska; Schröder-Kraft, Claudia; Buhl, Timo.
Afiliação
  • Geier J; Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK), Institute at the University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
  • Schubert S; Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK), Institute at the University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
  • Schnuch A; Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK), Institute at the University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
  • Szliska C; Department of Dermatology, Bethesda Hospital, Freudenberg, Germany.
  • Weisshaar E; Occupational Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Ruprecht-Karl University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Kränke B; Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Werfel T; Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Division of Immunodermatology and Allergy Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
  • Ruëff F; Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Schröder-Kraft C; Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatologic Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) of the University of Osnabrück and Dermatologic Center, BG Trauma Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Buhl T; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Contact Dermatitis ; 84(6): 407-418, 2021 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33533485
BACKGROUND: In about half of the patients reacting positive to fragrance mix I (FM I), breakdown testing remains negative. This raises the question of whether the reaction to FM I is false-positive, or the breakdown test is false-negative. OBJECTIVES: To identify characteristics and sensitization patterns of patients positive to FM I, but not to its fragrance constituents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) between 2005 and 2019. Three patient groups were defined according to their reaction pattern: Group I, FM I positive and ≥1 single fragrance positive in the breakdown test (n = 1912); Group II, FM I positive and breakdown test negative (n = 1318); Group III, FM I negative (n = 19 790). RESULTS: Regarding the pattern of concomitant reactions to other fragrances, Group II had an intermediate position between Group I and Group III. In other respects (age and sex distribution, frequency of sensitization to non-fragrance baseline series allergens), Group II rather resembled Group I. CONCLUSIONS: Not every positive reaction to FM I in patients with negative breakdown tests is false-positive. There may be false-negative reactions to the single fragrance components when patch tested at 1% pet. Raising patch concentrations of some single fragrances is recommended.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes do Emplastro / Dermatite Alérgica de Contato / Odorantes Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes do Emplastro / Dermatite Alérgica de Contato / Odorantes Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article