Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Non-invasive ventilation alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen versus high-flow nasal oxygen alone after extubation in COPD patients: a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
Thille, Arnaud W; Coudroy, Rémi; Nay, Mai-Anh; Gacouin, Arnaud; Decavèle, Maxens; Sonneville, Romain; Beloncle, François; Girault, Christophe; Dangers, Laurence; Lautrette, Alexandre; Levrat, Quentin; Rouzé, Anahita; Vivier, Emmanuel; Lascarrou, Jean-Baptiste; Ricard, Jean-Damien; Razazi, Keyvan; Barberet, Guillaume; Lebert, Christine; Ehrmann, Stephan; Massri, Alexandre; Bourenne, Jeremy; Pradel, Gael; Bailly, Pierre; Terzi, Nicolas; Dellamonica, Jean; Lacave, Guillaume; Robert, René; Ragot, Stéphanie; Frat, Jean-Pierre.
Afiliação
  • Thille AW; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Poitiers, France. aw.thille@gmail.com.
  • Coudroy R; Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1402 ALIVE, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France. aw.thille@gmail.com.
  • Nay MA; Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Poitiers, 2 rue la Milétrie, 86021, Poitiers Cedex, France. aw.thille@gmail.com.
  • Gacouin A; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Poitiers, France.
  • Decavèle M; Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1402 ALIVE, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
  • Sonneville R; Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Orléans, France.
  • Beloncle F; Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Réanimation Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Hôpital Ponchaillou, Rennes, France.
  • Girault C; Service de Pneumologie, Médecine Intensive et Réanimation (Département R3S), Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire APHP-Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
  • Dangers L; Hôpital Bichat, Claude Bernard, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, AP-HP, Université de Paris, INSERM U1148, Paris, France.
  • Lautrette A; Département de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire D'Angers, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.
  • Levrat Q; Département de Réanimation Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine (IRIB), Normandie Université, UNIROUEN, EA3830-GRHV, Rouen, France.
  • Rouzé A; Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Félix Guyon, Saint Denis de la Réunion, France.
  • Vivier E; Service de Réanimation Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Lascarrou JB; Service de Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier de La Rochelle, La Rochelle, France.
  • Ricard JD; Centre de Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
  • Razazi K; Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier Saint-Joseph Saint-Luc, Lyon, France.
  • Barberet G; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Nantes, France.
  • Lebert C; Hôpital Louis Mourier, Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, AP-HP, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, UMR IAME 1137, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Colombes, France.
  • Ehrmann S; Service de Réanimation Médicale, DHU A-TVB, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.
  • Massri A; Site Emile Muller, Service de Réanimation Médicale, Groupe Hospitalier Régional Mulhouse Sud Alsace, Mulhouse, France.
  • Bourenne J; Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Départemental de Vendée, La Roche Sur Yon, France.
  • Pradel G; Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CIC 1415, Réseau CRICS-Trigger SEP, Centre d'étude des Pathologies Respiratoires, INSERM U1100, Université de Tours, Tours, France.
  • Bailly P; Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Service de Réanimation, Pau, France.
  • Terzi N; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Timone 2, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Réanimation des Urgences, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
  • Dellamonica J; Service de Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Henri Mondor d'Aurillac, Aurillac, France.
  • Lacave G; Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brest, Brest, France.
  • Robert R; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, INSERM, Université Grenoble-Alpes, U1042, HP2, Grenoble, France.
  • Ragot S; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Archet 1, UR2CA, Université Cote d'Azur, Nice, France.
  • Frat JP; Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, Le Chesnay, France.
Ann Intensive Care ; 11(1): 30, 2021 Feb 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33559765
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Several randomized clinical trials have shown that non-invasive ventilation (NIV) applied immediately after extubation may prevent reintubation in patients at high-risk of extubation failure. However, most of studies included patients with chronic respiratory disorders as well as patients without underlying respiratory disease. To date, no study has shown decreased risk of reintubation with prophylactic NIV after extubation among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We hypothesized that prophylactic NIV after extubation may decrease the risk of reintubation in COPD patients as compared with high-flow nasal oxygen. We performed a post hoc subgroup analysis of COPD patients included in a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing prophylactic use of NIV alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen versus high-flow nasal oxygen alone immediately after extubation.

RESULTS:

Among the 651 patients included in the original study, 150 (23%) had underlying COPD including 86 patients treated with NIV alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen and 64 patients treated with high-flow nasal oxygen alone. The reintubation rate was 13% (11 out of 86 patients) with NIV and 27% (17 out of 64 patients) with high-flow nasal oxygen alone [difference, - 14% (95% CI - 27% to - 1%); p = 0.03]. Whereas reintubation rates were significantly lower with NIV than with high-flow nasal oxygen alone at 72 h and until ICU discharge, mortality in ICU did not differ between groups 6% (5/86) with NIV vs. 9% (6/64) with high-flow nasal oxygen alone [difference - 4% (95% CI - 14% to 5%); p = 0.40].

CONCLUSIONS:

In COPD patients, prophylactic NIV alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen significantly decreased the risk of reintubation compared with high-flow nasal oxygen alone. Trial registration The study was registered at http//www.clinicaltrials.gov with the trial registration number NCT03121482 (20 April 2017).
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article