Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The technical aspects of ex vivo hepatectomy with autotransplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Baimas-George, Maria; Thompson, Kyle J; Watson, Michael D; Iannitti, David A; Martinie, John B; Baker, Erin H; Levi, David; Vrochides, Dionisios.
Afiliação
  • Baimas-George M; Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
  • Thompson KJ; Department of Surgery, Carolinas Center for Surgical Outcomes Science, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
  • Watson MD; Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
  • Iannitti DA; Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
  • Martinie JB; Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
  • Baker EH; Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
  • Levi D; Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
  • Vrochides D; Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA. Dionisios.Vrochides@atriumhealth.org.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 406(7): 2177-2200, 2021 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33591451
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Ex vivo hepatectomy is the incorporation of liver transplant techniques in the non-transplant setting, providing opportunity for locally advanced tumors found conventionally unresectable. Because the procedure is rare and reports in the literature are limited, we sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating technical variations of ex vivo hepatectomies.

METHODS:

In the literature, there is a split in those performing the procedure between venovenous bypass (VVB) and temporary portacaval shunts (PCS). Of the 253 articles identified on the topic of ex vivo resection, 37 had sufficient data to be included in our review.

RESULTS:

The majority of these procedures were performed for hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (69%) followed by primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. In 18 series, VVB was used, and in 18, a temporary PCS was performed. Comparing these two groups, intraoperative variables and morbidity were not statistically different, with a cumulative trend in favor of PCS. Ninety-day mortality was significantly lower in the PCS group compared to the VVB group (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION:

In order to better elucidate these differences between technical approaches, a registry and consensus statement are needed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Fígado / Equinococose Hepática / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Fígado / Equinococose Hepática / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article