Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Decreased antibiotic exposure using a procalcitonin protocol for respiratory infections and sepsis in US community hospitals (ProCommunity).
DeSear, Kathryn E; Thompson-Leduc, Philippe; Van Schooneveld, Trevor C; Kirson, Noam; Chritton, Jacqueline J; Ie, Sue; Cheung, Hoi Ching; Ou, Susan; Zimmer, Louise; Schuetz, Philipp.
Afiliação
  • DeSear KE; Community Health Systems PSC, LLC, Franklin, TN, USA.
  • Thompson-Leduc P; Analysis Group, Inc, Montreal, Canada.
  • Van Schooneveld TC; Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
  • Kirson N; Analysis Group, Inc, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Chritton JJ; Clinical Surveillance, Wolters Kluwer, Health, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Ie S; Community Health Systems PSC, LLC, Franklin, TN, USA.
  • Cheung HC; Analysis Group, Inc, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Ou S; Analysis Group, Inc, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Zimmer L; bioMérieux, Inc, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Schuetz P; Medical University Department, Kantonsspital Aarau and faculty at the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 37(5): 727-733, 2021 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33617362
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Antibiotic overuse leading to antimicrobial resistance is a global public health concern. Clinical trials have demonstrated that procalcitonin-based decision-making for antibiotic therapy can safely decrease inappropriate antibiotic use in patients with respiratory infections and sepsis, but real-world data are scarce. This study sought to assess the impact of a procalcitonin-based antibiotic stewardship program (protocol plus education) on antibiotic use in community hospitals.

METHODS:

An observational, retrospective, matched cohort study was conducted. Eligible patients treated in hospitals with a procalcitonin-based protocol plus education (Procalcitonin cohort hospitals) were matched to patients admitted to facilities without procalcitonin testing (Control cohort hospitals) using a 12 ratio. The Control hospitals were facilities where procalcitonin testing was not available on site. Patient matching was based on (1) age, (2) gender, (3) admission diagnosis code using groupings of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, (4) whether patients were admitted to the intensive care unit, and (5) whether a blood culture test was performed. Procalcitonin cohort hospitals implemented a quality improvement initiative, where procalcitonin was available, used regularly, and clinicians (physicians and pharmacists) were educated on its use.

RESULTS:

After adjustment, patients in the Procalcitonin cohort had 1.47 fewer antibiotic days (9.1 vs. 8.5 days, 95%CI -2.72; -0.22, p = .021). There was no difference in length of stay or adverse clinical outcomes except for increase in acute kidney injury (odds ratio = 1.26, 95%CI 1.01; 1.58, p = .038).

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients with respiratory infections and sepsis in hospitals utilizing a procalcitonin-based protocol coupled with education received fewer days of antibiotic therapy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Respiratórias / Sepse Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Respiratórias / Sepse Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article