Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Supporting smoking cessation and preventing relapse following a stay in a smoke-free setting: a meta-analysis and investigation of effective behaviour change techniques.
Shoesmith, Emily; Huddlestone, Lisa; Lorencatto, Fabiana; Shahab, Lion; Gilbody, Simon; Ratschen, Elena.
Afiliação
  • Shoesmith E; Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
  • Huddlestone L; Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
  • Lorencatto F; Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK.
  • Shahab L; Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
  • Gilbody S; Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
  • Ratschen E; Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Addiction ; 116(11): 2978-2994, 2021 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33620737
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

Admission to a smoke-free setting presents a unique opportunity to encourage smokers to quit. However, risk of relapse post-discharge is high, and little is known about effective strategies to support smoking cessation following discharge. We aimed to identify interventions that maintain abstinence following a smoke-free stay and determine their effectiveness, as well as the probable effectiveness of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) used in these interventions.

METHODS:

Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies of adult smokers aged ≥ 18 years who were temporarily or fully abstinent from smoking to comply with institutional smoke-free policies. Institutions included prison, inpatient mental health, substance misuse or acute hospital settings. A Mantel-Haenszel random-effects meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted using biochemically verified abstinence (7-day point prevalence or continuous abstinence). BCTs were defined as 'promising' in terms of probable effectiveness (if BCT was present in two or more long-term effective interventions) and feasibility (if BCT was also delivered in ≥ 25% of all interventions).

RESULTS:

Thirty-seven studies (intervention n = 9041, control n = 6195) were included 23 RCTs (intervention n = 6593, control n = 5801); three non-randomized trials (intervention n = 845, control n = 394) and 11 cohort studies (n = 1603). Meta-analysis of biochemically verified abstinence at longest follow-up (4 weeks-18 months) found an overall effect in favour of intervention [risk ratio (RR) = 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08-1.49, I2  = 42%]. Nine BCTs (including 'pharmacological support', 'goal-setting (behaviour)' and 'social support') were characterized as 'promising' in terms of probable effectiveness and feasibility.

CONCLUSIONS:

A systematic review and meta-analyses indicate that behavioural and pharmacological support is effective in maintaining smoking abstinence following a stay in a smoke-free institution. Several behaviour change techniques may help to maintain smoking abstinence up to 18 months post-discharge.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abandono do Hábito de Fumar / Política Antifumo Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abandono do Hábito de Fumar / Política Antifumo Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article