Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Device-related pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: An Australian and New Zealand point prevalence study.
Coyer, Fiona; Barakat-Johnson, Michelle; Campbell, Jill; Palmer, Jennifer; Parke, Rachael L; Hammond, Naomi E; Knowles, Serena; Doubrovsky, Anna.
Afiliação
  • Coyer F; Joint Appointment Intensive Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital and School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Australia; Institute of Skin Integrity and Infection Prevention, University of Huddersfield, UK; Level 3 Ned Hanlon Building, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
  • Barakat-Johnson M; Skin Integrity Lead, Sydney Local Health District, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia; Adjunct Associate Professor, School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Australia. Electronic address: michelle.barakatjohnson@health.nsw.gov.a
  • Campbell J; Conjoint Senior Research Fellow, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital and School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Australia. Electronic address: jill.campbell@qut.edu.au.
  • Palmer J; Intensive Care Services, Intensive Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Level 3 Ned Hanlon Building, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield St, Herston, Queensland, 4029, Australia. Electronic address: Jennifer.Palmer@health.qld.gov.au.
  • Parke RL; Cardiothoracic and Vascular Intensive Care Unit, Auckland City Hospital, 2 Park Road, Grafton, 1023, Auckland, New Zealand; School of Nursing, University of Auckland, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Cent
  • Hammond NE; Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia; Intensive Care Clinical Research Manager, Malcom Fisher Department of Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, Australia; Sydney Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: nha
  • Knowles S; The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: ppp@georgeinstitute.org.
  • Doubrovsky A; School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Australia. Electronic address: anna.doubrovsky@qut.edu.au.
Aust Crit Care ; 34(6): 561-568, 2021 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33622521
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Device-related pressure injuries (DRPIs) are an ongoing iatrogenic problem evident in intensive care unit (ICU) settings. Critically ill patients are at high risk of developing pressure injuries caused by devices.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of DRPI in critically ill patients in intensive care and the location, stage, and attributable device of DRPI and describe the products and processes of care used to prevent these injuries.

METHODS:

This was a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional point prevalence study of patients aged more than 16 years in Australian and New Zealand ICUs. The study was part of the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group Point Prevalence Program coordinated by The George Institute for Global Health. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURE:

Identification of DRPI on the study day was the main outcome measure.

RESULTS:

Of the 624 patients included from 44 participating ICUs, 27 were found to have 35 identified DRPIs, giving a point prevalence DRPI rate of 4.3% (27/624). Study patients had a mean age of 59 years, and 60.3% were men. Patients with DRPI compared with patients without DRPI were significantly heavier (median 92 kg versus 80 kg, respectively, p = 0.027), were less likely to survive the ICU (63.0% versus 85.9%, respectively, p = 0.015), had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores at admission to the ICU (median 20 versus 16, respectively, p = 0.001), received mechanical ventilation more often (88.9% versus 43.5%, respectively, p < 0.001), and were more frequently diagnosed with respiratory conditions (37.0% versus 18.6%, respectively, p = 0.022). Processes of care activities were surveyed in 42 ICUs. Most DRPIs were attributed to endotracheal tubes and other respiratory devices. Forty-two ICUs reported processes of care to prevent DRPI, and just more than half of the participating sites (54.8%, 23/44) reported a dedicated ICU-based protocol for prevention of DRPI.

CONCLUSION:

DRPIs pose a burden on patients in the ICU. Our study showed a DRPI prevalence comparable with other studies. Prevention strategies targeting DRPI should be included in ICU-specific pressure injury prevention guidelines or protocols.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Úlcera por Pressão / Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Úlcera por Pressão / Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article