Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Experimental sleep restriction increases latency jitter in pain elicited cortical responses.
Hansen, J O; Omland, P M; Nilsen, K B; Sand, T; Matre, D.
Afiliação
  • Hansen JO; NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Postboks 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Omland PM; NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Postboks 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Nilsen KB; St. Olavs Hospital, Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Postboks 3250 Sluppen, 7006, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Sand T; NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Postboks 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Matre D; National Institute of Occupational Health, Department of Work Psychology and Physiology, Gydas vei 8, 0363, Oslo, Norway.
Heliyon ; 7(2): e06188, 2021 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33659735
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Previous studies have shown increased pain scores to painful stimulation after experimental sleep restriction, but reduced or unchanged magnitude of the event related potentials (ERPs) when averaged in the time-domain. However, some studies found increased response magnitude when averaging in the time-frequency domain. The aim of this study was to determine whether ERP-latency jitter may contribute to this discrepancy.

METHODS:

Ninety painful electrical stimuli were given to 21 volunteers after two nights of 50% sleep restriction and after two nights of habitual sleep. ERPs were analyzed in the time-domain (N2-and P2-peaks) and time-frequency domain (power spectral density). We quantified latency jitter by the mean consecutive difference (MCD) between single-trial peak latencies and by phase locking value (PLV) across trials.

RESULTS:

P2-MCD increased from 20.4 ± 2.1 ms after habitual sleep to 24.3 ± 2.2 ms after sleep restriction (19%, p = 0.038) and PLV decreased from 0.582 ± 0.015 after habitual sleep to 0.536 ± 0.015 after sleep restriction (7.9%, p = 0.009). We found no difference for N2-MCD.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results indicate that partial sleep restriction increase latency jitter in cortical responses to experimental pain.

SIGNIFICANCE:

Latency jitter may contribute to the discrepancies between ERP-responses in the time-frequency domain and time-domain. Latency jitter should be considered when ERPs are analyzed.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article