Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Limited Sampling Strategy for Determination of Ibrutinib Plasma Exposure: Joint Analyses with Metabolite Data.
Le Louedec, Félicien; Gallais, Fanny; Thomas, Fabienne; White-Koning, Mélanie; Allal, Ben; Protin, Caroline; Ysebaert, Loïc; Chatelut, Étienne; Puisset, Florent.
Afiliação
  • Le Louedec F; Department of Pharmacology, Institut Claudius Régaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 31059 Toulouse, France.
  • Gallais F; Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, Inserm UMR1037, 31037 Toulouse, France.
  • Thomas F; Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, 31062 Toulouse, France.
  • White-Koning M; Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, Inserm UMR1037, 31037 Toulouse, France.
  • Allal B; Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, 31062 Toulouse, France.
  • Protin C; Department of Pharmacology, Institut Claudius Régaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 31059 Toulouse, France.
  • Ysebaert L; Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, Inserm UMR1037, 31037 Toulouse, France.
  • Chatelut É; Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, 31062 Toulouse, France.
  • Puisset F; Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, Inserm UMR1037, 31037 Toulouse, France.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ; 14(2)2021 Feb 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33670575
ABSTRACT
Therapeutic drug monitoring of ibrutinib is based on the area under the curve of concentration vs. time (AUCIBRU) instead of trough concentration (Cmin,ss) because of a limited accumulation in plasma. Our objective was to identify a limited sampling strategy (LSS) to estimate AUCIBRU associated with Bayesian estimation. The actual AUCIBRU of 85 patients was determined by the Bayesian analysis of the full pharmacokinetic profile of ibrutinib concentrations (pre-dose T0 and 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 h post-dose) and experimental AUCIBRU were derived considering combinations of one to four sampling times. The T0-1-2-4 design was the most accurate LSS (root-mean-square error RMSE = 11.0%), and three-point strategies removing the 1 h or 2 h points (RMSE = 22.7% and 14.5%, respectively) also showed good accuracy. The correlation between the actual AUCIBRU and Cmin,ss was poor (r2 = 0.25). The joint analysis of dihydrodiol-ibrutinib metabolite concentrations did not improve the predictive performance of AUCIBRU. These results were confirmed in a prospective validation cohort (n = 27 patients). At least three samples, within the pre-dose and 4 h post-dose period, are necessary to estimate ibrutinib exposure accurately.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article