Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation With the H-Coil in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Study.
Spagnolo, Francesca; Fichera, Mario; Chieffo, Raffaella; Dalla Costa, Gloria; Pisa, Marco; Volonté, Maria Antonietta; Falautano, Monica; Zangen, Abraham; Comi, Giancarlo; Leocani, Letizia.
Afiliação
  • Spagnolo F; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology - INSPE, Scientific Institute Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
  • Fichera M; San Raffaele Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
  • Chieffo R; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology - INSPE, Scientific Institute Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
  • Dalla Costa G; San Raffaele Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
  • Pisa M; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology - INSPE, Scientific Institute Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
  • Volonté MA; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology - INSPE, Scientific Institute Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
  • Falautano M; San Raffaele Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
  • Zangen A; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology - INSPE, Scientific Institute Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
  • Comi G; San Raffaele Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
  • Leocani L; Neurological Department, Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Front Neurol ; 11: 584713, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33679570
ABSTRACT

Background:

Pilot open-label application of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with H-coil in Parkinson's Disease (PD) have shown promising results.

Objective:

To evaluate safety and efficacy of high-frequency rTMS with H-coil in PD in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study.

Methods:

Sixty patients with PD were randomized into 3 groups M1-PFC (real stimulation on primary motor-M1 and pre-frontal cortices-PFC), M1 (real rTMS on M1, sham on PFC), Sham (apparent stimulation). Primary outcome was baseline-normalized percent improvement in UPDRS part III OFF-therapy at the end of treatment (12 rTMS sessions, 4 weeks). Secondary outcomes were improvement in UPDRS part III sub-scores, timed tests, and neuropsychological tests. Statistical analysis compared improvement following real and sham stimulation at the end of the protocol using either a t-test or a Mann-Whitney test.

Results:

All patients tolerated the treatment and concluded the study. One patient from M1-PFC group was excluded from the analysis due to newly discovered uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. No serious adverse effect was recorded. At the end of treatment, patients receiving real rTMS (M1-PFC and M1 combined) showed significantly greater improvement compared to sham in UPDRS part III total score (p = 0.007), tremor subscore (p = 0.011), and lateralized sub-scores (p = 0.042 for the more affected side; p = 0.012 for the less affected side). No significant differences have been oserved in safety and efficacy outcomes between the two real rTMS groups. Notably, mild, not-distressing and transient dyskinesias occurred in 3 patients after real rTMS in OFF state.

Conclusions:

The present findings suggest that high-frequency rTMS with H-coil is a safe and potentially effective procedure and prompt larger studies for validation as add-on treatment in PD.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article