Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Real-world biomarker testing rate and positivity rate in NSCLC in Spain: Prospective Central Lung Cancer Biomarker Testing Registry (LungPath) from the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP).
Salas, Clara; Martín-López, Javier; Martínez-Pozo, Antonio; Hernández-Iglesias, Teresa; Carcedo, David; Ruiz de Alda, Lucia; García, J Francisco; Rojo, Federico.
Afiliação
  • Salas C; Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
  • Martín-López J; External Quality Asessment (GCP) of the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP), Madrid, Spain.
  • Martínez-Pozo A; Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
  • Hernández-Iglesias T; External Quality Asessment (GCP) of the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP), Madrid, Spain.
  • Carcedo D; Pathology Department, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Ruiz de Alda L; Quality Control Program, Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP), Madrid, Spain.
  • García JF; Hygeia Consulting S.A, Barcelona, Spain david.carcedo@hygeiaconsulting.com.
  • Rojo F; Roche Farma S.A, Madrid, Spain.
J Clin Pathol ; 75(3): 193-200, 2022 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33722840
ABSTRACT

AIM:

The aim of this study was to describe the testing rate and frequency of molecular alterations observed in the Lung Cancer Biomarker Testing Registry (LungPath).

METHODS:

A descriptive study of NSCLC biomarker determinations collected from March 2018 to January 2019, from 38 Spanish hospitals, was carried out. Only adenocarcinoma and not otherwise specified histologies were included for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression. The testing rate and the positivity rate were calculated. Multivariate logistic regression was used to explore the joint relationship between independent explanatory factors and both testing and positivity rates. Two models were adjusted one with sample type and histology as independent factors, and the other adding the testing rate or the positivity rate of the other biomarkers.

RESULTS:

3226 patient samples were analysed, where EGFR, ALK, ROS1 and PD-L1 information was collected (a total of 12 904 determinations). Overall, 9118 (71.4%) determinations were finally assessed. EGFR (91.4%) and ALK (80.1%) were the mainly tested biomarkers. Positivity rates for EGFR, ALK, ROS1 and PD-L1 were 13.6%, 3.4%, 2.0% and 49.2%, respectively. Multivariate models showed a lower testing rate for ALK in surgical pieces, fine-needle aspiration or other types of samples versus biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite the high testing rate in EGFR and ALK in NSCLC, the real-world evidence obtained from the LungPath demonstrates that ROS1 and PD-L1 were not determined in a significant portion of patients. LungPath provides crucial information to improve the coverage in molecular testing in lung cancer, to monitor the positivity rate and the introduction of new biomarker testing in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biomarcadores Tumorais / Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biomarcadores Tumorais / Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article