Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Retrospective radiological review and classification of interval breast cancers within population-based breast screening programmes for the purposes of open disclosure: A systematic review.
Mullooly, Maeve; White, Gethin; Bennett, Kathleen; O'Doherty, Ann; Flanagan, Fidelma; Healy, Orla.
Afiliação
  • Mullooly M; Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: maevemullooly@rcsi.ie.
  • White G; Health Service Executive, Research and Development, National Health Library & Knowledge Service, Dr. Steevens Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
  • Bennett K; Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Data Science Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
  • O'Doherty A; BreastCheck, National Screening Service, Ireland.
  • Flanagan F; BreastCheck, National Screening Service, Ireland.
  • Healy O; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Eur J Radiol ; 138: 109572, 2021 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33726976
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Interval breast cancers occur following a negative breast screening mammogram and before the next scheduled appointment within screening programmes. Radiological review classifies them as cancers that develop between screens, cancers with no obvious malignant abnormalities on prior screens or cancers not detected at screening. This study aimed to systematically review published literature on the occurrence of open disclosure following interval cancer radiological reviews by breast screening programmes internationally in a retrospective setting and examine methodologies used for radiological reviews for the purposes of disclosure.

METHODS:

A search for relevant articles published (January 2000 - May 2019) was conducted according to PICO and PRISMA guidelines. The databases Pubmed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Cinahl, Web of Science, Embase, Science Direct and Global Health were searched. Relevant studies were reviewed if they had completed a retrospective review and classification of interval breast cancers.

RESULTS:

Of 46 relevant articles included, no study was identified that conducted a retrospective review purposely for open disclosure. Retrospective reviews were conducted for audit/quality assurance, and research including for radiologist education and learning. Variation in methodology was found across review type (non-blinded/semi-informed approach), number of reviewers and classification categories. The proportion of false negative cancers classified among the studies ranged from 4 to 40 %.

DISCUSSION:

Variation among radiological review practices were observed, which likely impacts classification results. To ensure standardised classification of interval breast cancers are employed for the purposes of open disclosure in screening settings, reproducible and consistent methodology is required.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article