Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
External Validation Demonstrates Limited Clinical Utility of a Preoperative Prognostic Calculator for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.
Monárrez, Rubén; Maltenfort, Mitchell G; Figoni, Andrew; Szapary, Hannah J; Chen, Antonia F; Hansen, Erik N; Kheir, Michael M.
Afiliação
  • Monárrez R; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopaedics, Baltimore, MD.
  • Maltenfort MG; Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Figoni A; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
  • Szapary HJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Chen AF; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Hansen EN; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
  • Kheir MM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
J Arthroplasty ; 36(7): 2541-2545, 2021 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33745800
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Preoperative calculation of treatment failure risk in patients undergoing surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is imperative to allow for medical optimization and targeted prevention. A preoperative prognostic model for PJI treatment failure was previously developed, and this study sought to externally validate the model.

METHODS:

A retrospective review was performed of 380 PJIs treated at two institutions. The model was used to calculate the risk of treatment failure, and receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) for each institution.

RESULTS:

When applying this model to institution 1, an AUC of 0.795 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.693-0.897) was found, whereas institution 2 had an AUC of 0.592 (95% CI 0.502-0.683). Comparing all institutions in which the model had been applied to, we found institution 2 represented a significantly sicker population and different infection profile.

CONCLUSION:

In this cohort study, we externally validated the prior published model for institution 1. However, institution 2 had a decreased AUC using the prior model and represented a sicker and less homogenous cohort compared with institution 1. When matching for chronicity of the infection, the AUC of the model was not affected. This study highlights the impact of comorbidities and their distributions on PJI prognosis and brings to question the clinical utility of the algorithm which requires further external validation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese / Artroplastia do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese / Artroplastia do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article